Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Starman417
While Horowitz “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations” he was completely unable to explain how 17 "errors and omissions" could all work against Trump.

WTactualF !?!

8 posted on 02/24/2020 4:25:18 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Polls are no longer designed to measure public sentiment but to influence it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
While Horowitz “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence

I know that there is a definition of “evidence” that requires it to be something accepted into the testimony in a court case. That had to be the definition used by the Clintons for the many times they said “there is no evidence ... “. Are there further special definitions for the words modifying evidence here: “documentary or testimonial”? If so what are they?

28 posted on 02/24/2020 6:04:50 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature

WHOROWITZ is a DIRTY DEMOCRAT!!!


36 posted on 02/25/2020 3:11:37 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson