Posted on 05/03/2020 9:56:10 AM PDT by conservative98
“...two additional people, who spoke on condition of anonymity...”
******************
Perfect! Sounds a lot like a whistle blower to me. Now where did I recently hear about a democrat whistle blower making a big fuss?
In Your Collective Face you liberal democrat wackos!!
B-B-B-But We have to protect Pervy Uncle Joe for the Greater Good!/s
Good point. It was even before the Monica Lewinsky case, so to take on a Senator would be pretty scary for a young woman with no power.
I read today that she filed a police complaint when it happened. That was the first I heard that. That would be a game changer. We’ll see if it is true.
No different than Ballsy Ford? Hardly. Ford couldn’t remember ANYTHING about the “attack.” She accused Kavanaugh of a clumsy teen high school student briefly fondling her with her clothes on. There was NO corroboration of it. Nobody remembered it.
The Reade accusation has many credible corroborators, contemporaneous reporting, possibly a police report, and probably a Senate personnel file report. Plus it was FORCIBLE vaginal insertion by a U.S. Senator.
You think these are the same?
I don't know what you were reading. The headline does not say it "confirms". It says it "back"s as in providing supporting testimony; i.e. corroboration from contemporary witnesses who heard and believed her AT THE TIME.
Ford could not produce contemporary sources.
Exactly! they kept tgeir stupid demoncat mouths shut all through the 1990s with Bill Clinton and all his escapades!!
That guy was a serial adulterer and assaulter!!!
He even did a 20-year-old intern in the oval office multiple times and then lied about it( OK I’ll be fair here anybody would’ve lied about that lol ! )
>>>I don’t know what you were reading. The headline does not say it “confirms”. It says it “back”s as in providing supporting testimony; i.e. corroboration from contemporary witnesses who heard and believed her AT THE TIME.
One is actually 10 years later and dicusses sexual harassment, not sexual assault.
Let the left eat the left and stew in this dog sh*t. We have a campaign war to wage. This Tara is a full blown leftist who never changed her spots no matter what happened with perv Biden. Biden as the opposition is much better than the replacement which would put wind in the sails of the DNC and media.
My problem is with you injecting “confirms” into the headline and then taking it to task as incorrect. The headline only refers to “back”s. You took it upon yourself to use the word “confirm”. Thus, your post was “fake”.
Ok, but the two stories do not back a claim of sexual assualt as the headline claims. So the headline is fake news, correct?
I do not agree. The two stories corroborate Tara’s story that something of a sexual nature occurred in 1993 which involved Joe Biden. Whether it was full “sexual assault” is something being stated by Tara.
Ford had nobody who provided contemporary sources to back her claims.
Sexist thugs at the New York Times and Washington Post want a video of the assault... before they give a damn. They have two standards - one for liberal elite women like Anita Hill - where talk of one public hair counts more than the rape of ten powerless women or a hundred 'deplorable women'...
Powerless women and Republican women are fair game for democrat thugs. The press set that standard.
Everyone's known the double standard since Teddy killed his intern and the press FELT SORRY FOR TEDDY THE KILLER NOT THE WOMAN... AND IT'S BEEN DOWNHILL EVER SINCE. EFF EM...
Ha ha, Anita Hill. Biden thought he was really clever attacking Clarence Thomas many decades ago.
Now true justice turns the story around.
This is just the beginning. Biden has been at it for decades.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.