Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith
If he were sellout, he would have sold out to slavery.

You're kidding. I think i've spent the better part of all my conversations with you trying to make you understand that this is exactly what he did. Yes, he "sold out" to slavery. What do you think the Corwin Amendment was?

Again, here is a black Boston College professor that can perhaps explain it to you better than I can.

You seemingly aren't grasping the fact that yes, Lincoln did in fact try to "sell out" on the issue of slavery.

Funding his corporate buddies was more important to him.

Lincoln led a war against slavery and then he gave his life for the cause.

He led a war to subjugate the South, and which he tacked on "ending slavery" about 18 months after he started the war. He didn't "give" his life for the "cause", the "cause" was over and he was shot unwillingly. At least I presume he was unwilling to get shot, but I could be wrong about that.

303 posted on 06/22/2020 7:32:43 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

I don’t think your opinion is accurate.


304 posted on 06/22/2020 2:14:42 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson