To: White Lives Matter
they cannot LEGALLY certify the votes but they can and are doing so anyway
now what?
PDJT needs to sign onto the Texas lawsuit to give it “standing”, no amount of tweeting can do this
8 posted on
12/13/2020 5:52:47 PM PST by
faithhopecharity
(Politicians are not born, they are excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: faithhopecharity
“PDJT needs to sign onto the Texas lawsuit to give it “standing””
He did. The Texas lawsuit is dead. The SC rendered all those that signed on as moot.
15 posted on
12/13/2020 5:54:46 PM PST by
redfreedom
(Member of Agent Orange Health Club Since 1969)
To: faithhopecharity
He did that before SCOTUS declined the case.
19 posted on
12/13/2020 5:55:05 PM PST by
OKSooner
(This right here is how to do a paragraph break. ==> <p>)
To: faithhopecharity
If you are referring to the Texas suit that was turned down by SCOTUS on Friday, he had signed onto it.
24 posted on
12/13/2020 6:00:42 PM PST by
curious7
To: faithhopecharity
PDJT needs to sign onto the Texas lawsuit to give it “standing”, no amount of tweeting can do this He did. The Court voted 7-2 that Texas had no standing, but they voted 9-0 that he couldn't intervene in the case.
To: faithhopecharity
PDJT needs to sign onto the Texas lawsuit to give it “standing”, no amount of tweeting can do this His signing on did not, and will not ever give standing for Texas to be heard.
135 posted on
12/13/2020 8:16:06 PM PST by
tarpit
To: faithhopecharity
He already did, and they said “no standing.”
147 posted on
12/13/2020 8:36:20 PM PST by
SPDSHDW
(Either its shooting time, or we take the long hard path, and force the GOP to Whig out. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson