Who cares if I'm convinced? The judge matters, and he said he'll hold a trial on these allegations in April of 2021.
All I can say, based on 42 years as a lawyer, is that an expert's initial opinion rarely looks as good after cross-examination.
In the last case I tried before I retired, the plaintiff offered what they called "the nation's foremost valuation expert" who testified on direct examination that a company was worth between $50-$100 million. After he was cross-examined (not by me, by my partner), the judge found the company was worth zero.
My only point is, don't take one side's claim and say it was what a judge found. This Wisconsin judge found hasn't made any findings yet.
Sorry, Michigan judge, not Wisconsin.