To: ZOOKER
On the video, a professor explains that the area was NOT under water 9,000 years ago...Lake Michigan was there, but this area was the coastal plain...The lake rose to it’s present level 3,500 years later...
11 posted on
12/19/2020 8:33:55 AM PST by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
To: JBW1949
the area was NOT under water 9,000 years ago...Lake Michigan was there, but this area was the coastal plain...The lake rose to it’s present level 3,500 years later...Interesting...
17 posted on
12/19/2020 8:38:13 AM PST by
GOPJ
(If China let go a virus that primarily killed gays, would Madison Ave. still up Chinese in TV ads? )
To: JBW1949
On the video, a professor explains that the area was NOT under water 9,000 years ago...Lake Michigan was there, but this area was the coastal plain...The lake rose to it’s present level 3,500 years later...
Whoa. That's some fast rising water. Did the professor on video explain where all that water came from?
30 posted on
12/19/2020 8:53:38 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, demonicRATS would have no standards at all.)
To: JBW1949
Did the lake rise, or did it fall?
50 posted on
12/19/2020 9:18:14 AM PST by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: JBW1949
That is correct. The lakes werent even there.
Under the big Mac bridge, there is the channel for the ancient river.
58 posted on
12/19/2020 9:57:24 AM PST by
crz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson