That seems like an impossibly high throughput.
not really. A bar code scanner can be set to be triggered by the damage doenwhen a piece of paper stock is folded. If the is not fold damage the ballot zips along. But any ballot with fold damage is kicked out. The process is applied to assembly lines in canning factories and bottling factories every day, at very high speed.
I believe he has scanning hardware that can detect the kinetic imprints thst occur from folds
Ie he’s got specialized tools that can quickly search large volumes of items
That is, its an impossibly high throughput unless the inspection is automated. Doesn’t sound possible for inspection of physical ballots; rather like an analysis of the counting process.
He said he was going to put them through his own machines to detect the fraud
“look at” might be the newpaper euphemism
for “removing stored retrievable data,
code at that moment (at least), and physical connectivities”
he does it my machine
Pulitzer said that the same scanners are used to check for counterfeit bills.
He explained at the GA Senate that his computer-interfaced high speed scanners apply machine learning to the ballots as they go, so they can recognize the counterfeits faster and faster as the process goes along.
Many years ago I was at a convention listening to a physicist talking about his new photo optic scanning machine. Two guys behind me were ridiculing everything he said. No way he could do that so fast, they said. They were wrong.
He does it electronically.