For me, the video came across as more honest and convincing because it WASN’T “professionally” done. One reason we love Trump is because he isn’t smoooth and slick.
The weakest part of the vid is Mike himself - an awful interviewer, over using the single word “wow” constantly.
However, the evidence shone thru the poor interviewer skills - Mike is an entrepreneur, not an interviewer.
Fanning was the best.
Now, I’d expect a followup - release Fanning’s data, PDF form , for all to see for themselves. And yes, explain further - how was this information gathered (I presume by NSA, sniffing the Leonardi and other satellites, etc).
It seems as though Dr. Shiva’s analysis was similar to what forensic accountants do. He worked with publicly available evidence and revealed the odds of Biden winning being astronomically small. These types of analyses are allowed as supporting evidence in court.