[gtwizard]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe everyone is missing the KEY element in this case. This case has not only to do with the "attack and retreat" issue, it directly will set precedent for the "MOOTNESS" doctrine, whether a case is moot or not and can a moot case be dismissed without hearing if someone has skin in the game.

This is vastly important because the Supreme Court has ruled the 2020 Election Fraud cases brought before it most recently are all "MOOT" and therefore dismissed.

I find it hard to believe they will fall for this but I do love a good red herring. Couching a mootness judgment within a college free speech case is clever. I just don't think the Supremes will bite as it would disallow "mootness" as a condition for a court to dismiss a case.

[Sans-Culotte]

I just don't think the Supremes will bite as it would disallow "mootness" as a condition for a court to dismiss a case.

I would think SCOTUS would pass for the reason you cite. If they do take it, it will be in order to use it as a big "F you" to Trump to show that mootness is what they say it is.