Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

Unless I’m reading this wrong, it looks to me that the Army is reconsidering their lessor physical standards for women. That’s good news if so.


20 posted on 03/16/2021 4:16:17 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1776. Death Certificate - 2021.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: A Navy Vet
It's lower physical fitness standards are good for women if they want to be promoted.

The AFCT grade is part of promotion criteria.

But it certainly isn't good for Army readiness.

22 posted on 03/16/2021 4:21:01 PM PDT by PROCON (Our rights do not come from government, therefore they cannot take them away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: A Navy Vet

“it looks to me that the Army is reconsidering their lessor physical standards for women.”

Nope.

They tried to go to a single standard scoring table, with no separate ones for age or gender. (https://www.army.mil/e2/downloads/rv7/acft/fy20_standards.pdf )

Apparently, the lowest common denominators selected, were not low enough to retain enough women.

It looks like they will make some administrative change to how women’s scores are handled (like hide them from promotion boards, and not discharge any for failing the test), until the minimums are lowered again, or a separate (lesser) scoring table for women is adopted.


37 posted on 03/16/2021 5:22:39 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson