[Dr. Franklin]

A sixth order polynomial fit to a curve is not evidence of anything.

Great strawman, but that isn't what this is about. This is about graphing population, registered voters, and Nov. 2020 voters. What results is the polynomial function curve, but those curves fit the "key", not vice-versa. Unless you can prove that the underlying data is wrong, that it has been altered somehow, Frank's proof would stand up in court, provided we get past the standing BS.

[palmer]

No, I watched the video although it was torture. The x axis is age and the two curves are actual and registered voters. Framk fit a polynormial to the actual voter curve, then claims the fit is proof of the manipulation. Even if the machines manipulate votes, which is entirely possible, the curve fits is not proof of that.

But the main problem is Frank doesn't understand vote counting and voter recording. The counting machines don't know who the voters are, they just count anonymous ballots. So they can't do what he says. Furthermore the actual voter curve doesn't come from the counting machine, it comes from envelope sticker scanning. The anonymous ballot is removed from that envelope. That's a big reason why ignoring the signature in GA, PA and elsewhere allowed so many fraudulent votes.

Frank's proof would stand up in court, provided we get past the standing BS.

Discovery will be costly for the plaintiffs. Lindell would end up paying a lot of money to voting machine companies because Frank is so obviously wrong. I think that's part of the goal here. But the main reason there are so many bonehead theories about algorithms is to distract from the actual massive fraud.