Posted on 06/01/2021 9:42:35 AM PDT by blam
Democrats in Congress are mentally ill.
I don’t see the need for liberals to threaten a court which already seems to have a bias for protecting liberal causes and the interests of the Deep State.
“if this activist majority betrays fundamental constitutional principles.”
Principles like “Emanations” and “Penumbras”, public “benefit” equals public “use”, The Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex . . .
those kinds of principles?
yeah, that’s what I thought.
100%
threatening a judge used to be illegal
***************
Our so-called justice system is now entirely “situational”. What is illegal is subject to fluid interpretations and the ethic background of those involved in a particular matter.
Justice is whatever they want it to be.
“Who ‘warns’ a Supreme Court Justice....or otherwise threatens ANY public official, and walks away without charges ??”
Good question. Who threatened SCOTUS so they refuseded to hear the TX case re the election? Somebody did. Who threatened them to rule against Trump in every case re the election?
Democrats do it all the time.
This guy’s feeling pretty comfortable in his position to make statements like this. There’s never been a real serious challenge to this guy since Linda McMahon ran against him. He needs to be replaced along with his friend Murphy.
The Congress can step in a limit or set the courts jurisdiction. (See Article III Section 2) Something Congress never even attempts to do !
I actually would rather have the court say what is constitutional and what is not. Not have it decided by the political whims of the legislature . Particularly a legislature like the one we have now with a Pelosi & Schumer making most of the decisions.
Schumer threatened the SCOTUS outside the chambers on the steps of the Capitol— a FEDERAL offense.
Where did Blumenthal make these threats? Both should be pursued.
Consequences for Them, these two ultra Leftists. These are Tyrants.
He probably shouldn’t worry with John Roberts guiding the court.
Only after he's partially hung, then drawn, then quartered, and all his little pieces strung up in a line, to do the Tyburn jig in unison.
Don’t YOU try it!!
Not with a communist regime already in power. No back sliding permitted. Witness Castro and Maduro. That is the goal.
Am not so sure. During Tx appeal to SCOTUS Roberts berated three new, conservative justices. Supposedly, he was afraid of riots in the street. Which, to my mind, makes me wonder what country he’d been linving in for previous 8 months. Regadless, his unconstitutional behavior in editting ObamaCare into a tax bill and then not returning it to the House as required by the Constituion left me wondering about his loyalty to the Const. He is a big disaster in waiting.
Is that what Biden meant yesterday when he said “Democracy itself is in peril”?
Bttt
The tree of liberty is parched beyond belief.
“..stir up Your people to do what’s right.”
Guess you are calling the Angels “Your people”. Never thought of them that way. Pretty cool!
“Each state shall appoint, in such a manner as the legislature thereof may direct...”
Judicial meddling in violation of state law made the election unlawful.
Judicially-instigated Postal Service meddling in violation of state law made the election unlawful.
Election fraud in violation of state law made the election unlawful.
We have no lawful President because the election was not conducted in a constitutional manner.
The United States legally lacks a President and can’t place a new person on the Supreme Court until early 2025.
Would Joe Biden like a Supreme Court written opinion on this matter?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.