To: TigerClaws
I figured it would come down to feeling safe..
and no one in the jury would feel safe doing the right thing.
4 posted on
11/16/2021 2:35:16 PM PST by
cableguymn
(We need a redneck in the white house.... But the fact checkers said theintjey did story was false!)
To: cableguymn
Nonsense. They knew the risk and importance doing this and NOW they get cold feet? I smell psy ops here..
13 posted on
11/16/2021 2:37:49 PM PST by
max americana
(FIRED LEFTARD employees at our office every election since 2008 and enjoyed seeing them cry.)
To: cableguymn
Almost like they need a body guard with a gun.
To: cableguymn
I figured it would come down to feeling safe.
*************
It always comes down to something that benefits the Left.
To: cableguymn
Surely they realized that this case was a powder keg when they were interviewed and chosen. Couldn't a potential juror cite "fear of violence/retaliation" as a reason for not serving? Can the government force you to serve on a jury in spite of public awareness of potential bodily harm? Even the military is composed of volunteers, not draftees.
If the mobs really decide what "justice" is, why ever hold a trial for anything, ever? It means that it's OJ all-over-again, always.
61 posted on
11/16/2021 2:58:04 PM PST by
MHT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson