[ChessExpert]

I hear little about the JBS. Has their influenced waned in recent decades?

I once received literature from an anonymous source. JBS? In any case, I read it. It emphasized Jewish influence in the press. I think the authors were on the wrong track.

I thought, and think now more than ever, that there is a problem with the mainstream media. There is seeing a problem, and there is understanding a problem - two different things. The authors of the literature that I received at least saw a problem. In my estimation they did not understand the problem.

If the JBS saw a communist under every bed, they were mistaken; but no more so than a great many people who have no concern over communism.

As to the article above, there is no doubt in my mind that the US Supreme Court has decided unconstitutionally in the past, then built upon their precedents as though they had the force of law.

We may all have amendments we would like to see. As an economist, I would like to see a prohibition on all wage and price controls. As a potential patient, I do not see why I need a doctor’s prescription for HCQ, Ivermectin, or anything else. I can consult the doctors of my choice, in person or on the internet, and make my own decisions.

[cgbg]

The owners of the mainstream media are the problem with the mainstream media.

They are who they are.

[Bethaneidh]

Um, no. JBS always had many prominent Jews at all levels that were pretty vocal about it. Birchers never got into the “J- Conspiracy” thing.

[Fiji Hill]

I once received literature from an anonymous source. JBS? In any case, I read it. It emphasized Jewish influence in the press.

That could not have been from the JBS, which is vehemently opposed to Judeophobia. And they do not distribute anonymous literature.