To: TheManWhoWantedToBeLeftAlone
The author is presumptuous. I would suggest two alternatives here:
1. Maybe the jury didn't believe the dingbat cop's story.
2. Maybe the jury decided that they would hold an armed officer of the law to a higher standard than a doctor or an airline pilot when it comes to assessing cases of potential criminal conduct.
8 posted on
12/27/2021 5:38:06 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("All lies and jest; still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
To: Alberta's Child
Just as in the Rittenhouse case, the jury weighed the evidence, and rendered a verdict. They deliberated several days before coming to their decision. That’s how the system works.
44 posted on
12/27/2021 9:21:16 AM PST by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson