Posted on 01/16/2022 12:30:06 PM PST by C210N
Russia has three ways to influence the US. One of them is a nuclear warning strike on a test site in Nevada. You can even use missiles strategically.
This proposal was made on the air of the National Course YouTube channel by State Duma deputy from United Russia Yevgeny Fedorov.
“This is a training ground where the US military is located , there are no civilians there, and if you warn two or three days in advance, then it’s quite a good action to demonstrate the seriousness of intentions, ”the deputy expressed his opinion.
Fedorov noted that Russia can afford such actions and has on they are right.
“A missile that hits Nevada may be a blank, but in principle it could be a nuclear explosion, because the test site is nuclear, it is adapted for explosions,” the politician said.< /p>
He also suggested conducting demonstration flights over cities and “strike” bombs on American biological weapons laboratories. According to the deputy, this will make ordinary Americans feel that the threat of a Russian retaliatory strike against US aggression is not a bluff. When the citizens of the United States understand this, they will put pressure on their politicians.
Now that’s clever.
A nuclear shot over the bow.
We could sell tickets. Put bleachers on the Eastern slope of the Sierra!
If they warn everyone about a missile attack…and we shoot itdown, what does that do to the Russian standing in the world.
If only Dr.Strangelove could remain a darkly humorous satire.
Why does it have to come true?
Yeh, they’re totally going to invite us to annihilate them. 😆
“ By the Dawn’s Early Light”
Oldie but goodie movie
Lets play chess with nukes
Can we ask them to target SF or LA?
Why waste the missile on desert?
So did U.S. Rep. Eric Swallowwell.
I think we should blow up DC as a gesture of good faith for the Russians. Kind of a Catch 22 thing. Then again that might really piss them off. Removing their so called political pressure point option. It also would make a lot of us here at home happy, they can’t want that. Never mind.
They’re not really reading this administration. They have TONS of options, and my first recommendation would be an atmospheric ‘quality test’ in Siberia, but film it and put it on Twitter. That will scare the living Shiite out of our warmongers in DC and bring them to the table in good faith.
And if not, then send a drone sub off the coast of DC and detonate a small nuke in international waters. It would set off a nice sized tsunami, which would affect their vacation homes.
And lots more options short of exchanging cities or attacking bases. But if it comes to that, can we get a vote on which US cities to have them target?
We should say, go ahead and do it, we reserve the right to conduct a similar maneuver.
Plus tell them we will attempt to shoot down your missile and we’ll see if you can do something similar.
Gosh, America would NEVER see an incoming missile from Russia and respond!
NEVER!
Make it San Fran. But only if Pelosi is at home, and not in the District of Corruption.
Oh, and America would NEVER respond with force for Russian aerial violations of airspace!
PERISH THE THOUGHT!
However, if you were to hit some lovely place like Philadelphia, Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago, DC, Portland, etc., then Imma be upset.
I think MAD would preclude them from doing that though, pretty risky on their part. Their people can’t be as stupid as our people
I could see this get out of hand in a hurry.
They better not eff around with Biden he’ll put the corn pop move on’em.
Putin will invade Ukraine and keep it without firing a shot. Biden has demonstrated his spine in Afghanistan and Iraq.
“America would NEVER see an incoming missile from Russia and respond!”
Did not Øbowel state that the US could absorb a first strike and not respond, or something along those lines?
Bidet* is his puppet after all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.