Replies

To: dayglored; logi_cal869

But in any case, what's the point? Intentionally get themselves banned? For what useful end?

"I mean: Dumping this perfectly good tea into Boston Harbor - just because of a damn two-penny tax? For what useful end?"

Regards,

21 posted on 04/10/2022 10:40:28 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)

To: alexander_busek

26 posted on 04/10/2022 11:17:24 PM PDT by Equine1952

To: alexander_busek; logi_cal869

Dumping the Boston tea did not result in the colonists being prohibited from ever drinking tea again, nor even from dumping tea in the harbor again.

Getting oneself permanently banned from Twatter, in a show of solidarity with Broaddrick, is an opus. So I don't consider the Tea Party a great analogy.

I suppose leaving Twatter in a "blaze of glory" has some drama-queen appeal, but if I were a Twit and looking to piss them off enough to ban me, I'd choose something considerably more inflammatory. And I would have done so when Trump was banned. :-)

Cheers, y'all, have fun on Twatter....

52 posted on 04/11/2022 6:22:44 AM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794