To: JonPreston
If he had a tape, he would produce it. An idle threat right now means nothing.
To: bigdaddy45
If he had a tape, he would produce it. An idle threat right now means nothing. Is it not possible Trump is waiting for this stooge to deny it? Wouldn't that be perfect?
10 posted on
06/23/2022 3:44:18 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: bigdaddy45
If he had a tape, he would produce it. An idle threat.. means nothing.
Like idle conjecture. Right?
19 posted on
06/23/2022 4:00:01 PM PDT by
Born in 1950
(Anti left, nothing else.)
To: bigdaddy45
If he had a tape, he would produce it. An idle threat right now means nothing.Why would he produce it now?
If Trump has {or doesn't have} a tape, he'd do what he just did, tease.
36 posted on
06/23/2022 4:59:56 PM PDT by
USS Alaska
(NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
To: bigdaddy45
Bowers must have testified in the woods. This is the first time his name has been mentioned.
39 posted on
06/23/2022 6:36:32 PM PDT by
Lisbon1940
(I don’t see why they would)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson