Agreed, doing this would be some sort of tacit admission of guilt from the previous occasion. I asked my question earlier on this thread as these sorts of oleey and drooley articles from Gateway tend say a lot but you can not help but wonder somewhat about the actual substance.
“...but you can not help but wonder somewhat about the actual substance.”
I figure this is an election year so this little gesture that is really nothing more than appearance purposes is a slow fuzzy to get put on line so they can get it past November as creating this is not going to go together in 90 days. Nothing in congress can get done in 90 days unless it is closing session for vacations.
It took 10 weeks alone in Paris in the late 60s during the peace talks between the United States, South Vietnam, North Vietnam, and the National Liberation Front to determine the shape and size of the table they were going to use for the peace talks. Indication?
At best it is a sham toward moving to the middle to get votes. Some judge will consider it unconstitutional after the election it couldn’t be in place by saying something like it is adding another set of hands to the protection of the people’s wishes by non-poll administers...or something to that effect. This will create a voting box demand and completely out of the control of anyone not voter assigned. But that will be a Christmas present to the American people from uncle sugar. Appearance purposes, only. And they have two years at that point to come up with many ways to change election results and sell it to the fool liberal voters. Shouldn’t be too hard. They don’t indicate a much higher than room temp IQ with the choices they make, even if they make them themselves. They are generally told what to make and do it without thought.
wy69