As part of the scientific process, we are required to do a retrospective review (aka a post mortem) by the establishment.
Unfortunately, I don’t see this happening. Glass is half empty — why? what are they hiding?
“we must establish a second line of defense against the transmission of this deadly disease.”
Since when did a virus with a .5% fatality rate become a “deadly disease”.
Thankfully, when I was in the military, incompetence was rare, and usually limited to folks you’d find on CNN. Now?
It’s not rare, and still associated with CNN-level drivel.