I think there’s a difference...
The author shares an article from before the vaccine was rolled out to show that predictions were made, and predictions were proven true.
Global warming is wrong to the extent that it is unable to predict anything. That is exactly why it is no longer “Global Warming”, it is “Climate Change”.
There are a number of people who explained what would happen, and what was happening with this “vaccine” and they have been proven right. But, the point isn’t that they are in the right. The point is to learn why they were right and to be more skeptical of the prevailing narratives so that this doesn’t happen again. Likewise, it is important to allow free discourse to work these issues out and not depend on a hegemonic group of elites to control what can and can’t be discussed.
“ The author shares an article from before the vaccine was rolled out to show that predictions were made, and predictions were proven true.”
What’s the best example?