RE: But the question I asked was not a Constitutional question of requirements to serve, but an exercise of my rights to evaluate a candidate.
But your personal right to whoever you want to vote for, Christian or otherwise, was never in question. It’s Vivek’s QUALIFICATIONS that should be at issue here, and his being a Christian isn’t. His being a constitutionalist is.
—> But your personal right to whoever you want to vote for, Christian or otherwise, was never in question. It’s Vivek’s QUALIFICATIONS that should be at issue here
Disagree.
One qualification to get my vote is that a candidate adheres to Judeo-Christian values.
• He can run legally.
• He can earn my vote when he converts to Christianity.
Both true.
The second is unknown, which is why that was my question.