Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Roman_War_Criminal

Data is tricky.
You can’t simply compare death rates of the unjabbed with the jabbed at one-to-one, because the demographics are significantly different. The oldest and sickest were/are more likely to seek vaccination and boosters. They also die at a higher rate, hardly a surprise.

I don’t for a moment doubt the jab is an additional risk, which is why I declined it. But to quantify the risk you have to control for the differences in the groups.


18 posted on 06/22/2023 5:02:06 PM PDT by JustaTech (My mind is the weapon. Everything else is tools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JustaTech

Oh, but they are controlling for age.

Josh Stirling, the insurance exec, has data showing the group life insured population, those young enough to be working and thus signing up for group life policies, are experience higher excess death than the retired population.

A lot of these people were 25-45 and were without any health problems when they died. And many would have had the jabbed until penalty of firing.


21 posted on 06/22/2023 5:20:55 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson