Democrats WANT a 2nd Civil War

Flopping Aceshttps://www.floppingaces.net/2023/08/02/democrats-want-a-2nd-civil-war/ ^ | 08-02-23 | Scott Malensek

[Levy78]

They fight, that was the point. You ever been to Afghanistan? Didn’t think so. 🤡

[Dan in Wichita]

Then go live in Afghanistan and get the hell out of my country.

[fr_freak]

It’s clear the Democrats/communists now control the US military and will not hesitate to use it against average Americans to win in a civil war.

Yeah, they no doubt would, but that won't be nearly as effective as you might think. A modern civil war in the US ain't going to be Blue vs Grey meeting at Gettysburg - it's going to be guerrilla warfare all day long, to include hits on the families of military members should they attack US civilians. Logistics will be impossible. It would be a nightmare for everyone, and the Left would achieve a Pyrrhic victory at best (but I doubt they would get even that).

The reason I hate people saying "the Left wants a civil war!!!!" is because it suggests that civil war would be a tactical mistake for the Right, giving the Left what it wants. But as far as I'm concerned, that is a psyop, because threat of civil war is the only REAL leverage that the Right has left - the soap box is gone and the ballot box is gone . The 2A exists for a reason, and is our last refuge from tyranny. The Left would love for us to toss that aside.

[Dan in Wichita]

And shove your pot up your ass.

[Levy78]

Emotional, tiny little man. FOAD, geezer.

[Dan in Wichita]

Go smoke your pot.

[x]

Exactly, we are the fattest, most comfortable and passively entertained and least used to sustained physical labor of any population ever. It’s hard for me to imagine any past civil war ever jumping off with our current societal conditions.

In the Civil War, in most wars, you had the politicians and diplomats with the real quarrels and the mass of people who had to fight the war. Today, everybody's a politician and nobody's in shape to fight the war (except the professionals and maybe the fanatics). Too many generals and not enough privates. And the fact that, in contrast to the 1860s (or the 1940s) everybody is used to speaking their own mind all the time about everything means that it wouldn't be possible to keep order in the trenches and keep everyone on the same team and get things done.

[the OlLine Rebel]

No contest for aerial and artillery bombings.

Long ago should have recognized that “military” weapons ARE “arms” and thus anyone should be allowed them.

Strategy and tactics would have to be brilliant and the powerful gov lackadaisical to really succeed.

[cowboyusa]

The bombers have families, the planes and pilots have to land.

[the OlLine Rebel]

Agree I don’t like the “Left wants a CW” declarations.

But guerrilla warfare of pop guns vs nationwide network of major weapons systems and launch pads is not a good prospect.

[cowboyusa]

It would be a free for all.

[the OlLine Rebel]

You still are nothing compared to that.

Mere firearms are not the end-all be-all.

[x]

Long ago should have recognized that “military” weapons ARE “arms” and thus anyone should be allowed them.

If that were the case, Civil War II would have started years ago, or there would be little wars in different parts of the country at all times.

[cowboyusa]

Yeah, ok, the military couldn’t even beat a bunch of goat herders. There going to take on 150 million piss off Americans, give me a break.

[Pollard]

Largely inspired by democratic sentiment, opposition to election results widely viewed as falsified, and anti-corruption, the colour revolutions were marked by the usage of the internet as a method of communication,[1] as well as the strong role of non-governmental organizations in the protests.[2]

Widely viewed in our case = dems/leftists/media.

"strong role of non-governmental organizations in the protests"(2020 riots were organized and funded by leftist NGOs)

[Mr. K]

I’ve said it many times before. I don’t understand.

I used to wonder how Hitler found people willing to kill for him. Today’s liberals seem like they would be gleefully willing to.

While these blue haired girly men may want civil war to come , they won’t like the outcome.

It will be the cities versus the suburbs. With the primary focus and fighting being on keeping them in the cities

[MinorityRepublican]

No one is going to fight. We’re too comfortable. Until people starts to suffer. Then you may be right.

[MinorityRepublican]

After 9-11, G W Bush, along with the Democrats, set up the apparatus for an elaborate, redundant, insulated surveillance state. It became permanent.

George W. Bush could be trusted. He was benevolent. That was the problem. His successors aren't. And here we are. 9/11 is over. We've won the war on terror. Osama bin Laden is dead. So what's the deal?

[MIA_eccl1212]

their two primary physical problems...
1) they are dependent on agencies for their intel information and its implications (they all think like mikah and Joe that have no critical thinking skills)
2) their skill for implementation of OODA operations at a distance... physical rather than borig lawfare.
in summary they lack the information, interpretation and skills to engage and win due to 1 and 2

they do not imagine a God-Quantum level series of events...
aka: hornets and hemorrhoids. (they don’t actually believe that kind of stuff will happen to them.) But assuredly, it will... should be fun.

[This_Dude]

There was a time when we’d win a civil war against these loons, but sadly, they control the police, the military, the justice system, any lever of power they could possibly need to snuff us out. They could send feds to our house at 3am and shred our houses with automatic fire where we get to watch our wives and children get massacred in front of us and there’s nothing we can do to stop them.

This government could load us onto trains and gas us and no one could stop them anymore.