Sorry guys. Unless Dimon was a knowing participant, I think that he should stay in his lane, and not be in the business of debanking anyone.
Debanking?
When someone is using a bank for criminal activities and the people running the bank know this, they have a duty to get involved.
Sorry, sex trafficking—especially underage sex trafficking—deserves a lot more severe consequence than “debanking”.
The issue of debunking applies when it’s about politics or ideology. Not crime.
“Unless Dimon was a knowing participant, I think that he should stay in his lane, and not be in the business of debanking anyone.”
There’s a world of difference between “debanking” and what Dimon should have done, which was his legally obligated duty to detect and report criminals and money launderers attempting to use his bank to facilitate their criminal operations.