Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coalition of Leftist Attorney Generals Argue for the Power of States to Ban Common Arms
AmmoLand ^ | October 13, 2023 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 10/17/2023 7:04:19 AM PDT by marktwain

A coalition of leftist Attorney Generals for sixteen states and the District of Columbia has filed an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit appeal by the State of Hawaii, claiming state power to ban common arms is essential.  On August 7, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit reached the unsurprising conclusion that knives, particularly the type of pocket knife called a “butterfly knife” or “balisong,” were bearable arms. Therefore, they were protected by the Second Amendment of the Constitution, and the State of Hawaii did not have the legal authority to ban them.

On September 20, 2023, the State of Hawaii appealed to Teter v Lopez, claiming the three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit mistakenly applied the law, asking for a new panel or a hearing en banc. The Ninth Circuit has historically been hostile to the Second Amendment and has reversed the decision of three-judge panels that uphold Second Amendment rights.

On September 22, the plaintiffs, Teter and Grell, were ordered to file a response to the appeal within 21 days.

On October 2, 2023, the coalition of 14 state Attorney Generals and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in support of the appeal. The arguments of the State of Hawaii, the 14 leftist attorney generals, and the District of Columbia are remarkably similar. In sum, they are this:

  1. The Heller and Bruen decisions did not clarify that all bearable arms are preemptively covered by the Second Amendment (they carefully do not mention the unanimous Caetano decision, which says the opposite.)
  2. The Heller and Bruen decisions only protect arms shown to be in common use for self-defense.

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; hi; knife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
The left is working hard to define the Second Amendment into non-existence.

They claim only arms which can be proven to have been "commonly" and actively used in self defense cases, documented by the police, qualify for Second Amendment protection.

Has the Colt Python 2 1/2 inch .357 revolver been shown to actively have been used in more than 2000 self defense cases, documented by the police, in each year of the last ten years? If not, by this "logic" it is not protected by the Second Amendment.

1 posted on 10/17/2023 7:04:19 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It is not the right of the states to ban any guns.


2 posted on 10/17/2023 7:06:04 AM PDT by Jonty30 (It never rains in sunny Alberta. It always rains in rainy Alberta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Do it, and find out why we have them.


3 posted on 10/17/2023 7:07:56 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

IF you think government is overbearing now just wait until you are disarmed.


4 posted on 10/17/2023 7:08:27 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The generals statement is absolutely anathema to why the 2nd amendment exists in the first place. To protect the rights of the people from a totalitarian government that they are trying to impose.


5 posted on 10/17/2023 7:09:31 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

FA&FO


6 posted on 10/17/2023 7:24:56 AM PDT by Noumenon (You're not voting your way out of this. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
"A coalition of leftist Attorney Generals for sixteen states and the District of Columbia has filed an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit appeal by the State of Hawaii, claiming state power to ban common arms is essential."

I bet the residents of Michigan and Pennsylvania would love to know their state governments endorse this idea.

7 posted on 10/17/2023 7:25:59 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

Whatever happened to “geeezzzz, nobody’s coming after your guns….?”


8 posted on 10/17/2023 7:28:23 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Can’t find the list of 16 states. Anybody?


9 posted on 10/17/2023 7:38:07 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The real problem is:
It’s not OUR guns...
It’s THEIR sons.


10 posted on 10/17/2023 7:38:44 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Ping!


11 posted on 10/17/2023 7:41:48 AM PDT by Joe Brower ("Might we not live in a nobler dream than this?" -- John Ruskin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

States gifted or loaned the Federal Government the right to govern.

States are sovereign in that respect. They have the right and ability to remain sovereign under the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

There needs to be far more power wielded by States in seeking for control of the Fed. Governors and Legislatures are the key to making it happen.

On the other hand the Fed has blackmailed all fifty States into giving up their power so it will take a huge effort to right the ship of State.

When it all shakes out, there will be slave states and free states.


12 posted on 10/17/2023 7:45:23 AM PDT by wita (Under oath since 1966 in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

True dat.


13 posted on 10/17/2023 7:54:21 AM PDT by sauropod (I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wita; All

Agree!

This is why the 17th Amendment needs to be repealed and we go back to the method of selecting senators the founding fathers intended - the state legislatures. And yes, I am sure there are those out there with idiotic & corrupt state legislatures. All I can that means you have work to do! You could include term limits for senators with that. It might not be necessary. I think there are enough senator wannabes in the legislatures and state grand poobahs to make it competitive.

Also this is very important a test case needs to be set up for the USSC o overturn Reynolds vs Sims. This decision as predicted by Evertt Dirksen wrecked states financially & culturally with large urban centers. it allowed these large population to dominate and dictate to the state. State senates should mirror the arrangement of the US Constitution and represent regions in the state - like counties.


14 posted on 10/17/2023 8:01:18 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wita

The 2nd Amendment is not a power legislated by the Federal or State Governments.

It is a natural right. The founders fully understood that.

Texas will never accept gutting the 2nd Amendment.

They can pound sand.

Oh, they are sooo desperate to take our weapons now! Why now? Because of what they plan to do next. (finish destroying the Constitution and the Nation)


15 posted on 10/17/2023 8:03:22 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: daler

When you hear the words, “nobody wants to...” The next thing they say is exactly what they want to do.


16 posted on 10/17/2023 8:10:27 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
A coalition of leftist Attorney Generals for sixteen states and the District of Columbia has filed an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit appeal by the State of Hawaii, claiming state power to ban common arms is essential.

If they are claiming ‘State’s Rights’, this is a can of worms that they should only open after long and careful thought.

State’s rights could be claimed on any number of their sacred cows.

It has already struck down their blessed right of abortion. It could also strike down their much revered federal control of immigration.

But Libs always expect to have things their own way.

17 posted on 10/17/2023 8:21:39 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; All
"They claim only arms which can be proven to have been "commonly" and actively used in self defense cases, documented by the police [??? emphasis added], qualify for Second Amendment protection."

Given police departments in these activist states were partially defunded, a number of arms-related incidents were possibly never fully documented.

Report shows blue counties have higher murder rate than red, calls out 'flawed' studies promoted by top Dems (10.17.23)

Democratic and Republican Trump supporters need to support hopeful Trump 47 with new state and federal governments by primarying all state and federal incumbent lawmakers and executives in 2024, except for MTG, Gaetz & Company, Jordan (and others?).

After all, government leaders are not doing their jobs to uphold 14th Amendment (14A) protections by making laws to strengthen constitutionally enumerated protections, the 2nd Amendment in this example.

Excerpted from 14A:

In fact, the congressional record shows that when Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 above, read the Bill of Rights as main examples of constitutionally enumerated protections that 14A applies to the states, he included 2A.

“See 2nd Amendment (Article II) about middle of 2nd column.” — John Bingham, Appendix to the Congressional Globe

The Supreme Court had put it this way about 14A.

“3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnished an additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.

18 posted on 10/17/2023 8:22:21 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.

19 posted on 10/17/2023 8:49:25 AM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/2023-10-2%20Teter%20Amicus%20Brief%20FILED_0.pdf


20 posted on 10/17/2023 9:03:36 AM PDT by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson