You stated “ People studying evolution DON’T study bio-genesis” which is false and completely ignorant of the field.
I provided an example for your edification.
Here’s an abstract and excerpt from it.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12836680/
“ We examine whether and to what extent known evolutionary principles can be applied to an RNA-based world. We conclude that the major basic Neo-Darwinian principles that include amplification, variation and selection already governed evolution in the RNA and RNP worlds. In this hypothetical RNA world there were few restrictions on the exchange of genetic material and principles that acted as borders at later stages, such as Weismann’s Barrier, the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology, or the Darwinian Threshold were absent or rudimentary. RNA was more than a gene: it had a dual role harboring, genotypic and phenotypic capabilities, often in the same molecule.”
This is 20 years old and it is still an active area of study in the evolutionary field..
Of course you do realize that co-disciplinary efforts happen right? Which doesn’t at all change the fact that they are different disciplines. Like when we make mars missions, those involve orbit guys, and electronics guys, and rocket guys, and chip guys, etc etc. And just because they’re working together doesn’t make a rocket guy a chip guy. Oh no of course you don’t. That would prove you wrong. Again.