Hoft is a moron.
If you believe what he is saying, you don’t know how the system works. The fact that the judge already ruled against Trump is no secret, or shock, or surprise. This follows the same, “no jury” crap.
I guess Hoft needed some clicks on a Sunday morning.
New York AG Letitia James campaigned on her ghetto-nurtured jihad to “get Trump” but first she had “to find a crime.” She brazenly alleged ——using govt power-—that Trump and his company defrauded Deutsche Bank by submitting his inflated net worth statements to get a better interest rate and, in doing so, he also violated loan requirements called covenants.
Then came the evidence at trial.
A bank professional—— Deutsche Bank managing director of its wealth management group, trained to detect bank fraud-—testified in court that large changes to net worth like Trump’s wealth “isn’t unusual.”
The bank always anticipates beforehand that the net worth of high-wealth clients like Donald Trump can certainly be elevated on self-reported financial statements.
However official bank policy is that fact alone wouldn’t necessarily stop the bank from issuing the loan.
And didn’t for Trump......he got his loan, he paid it back, the bank made money.
I don’t know who’s worse ... hoft or ‘sundance’ ...
Thank-you. I wish Clickbait Pundit would just go away. 235-2275
No jury and no trial. The judge decided the verdict and the current action is to ratify stealing Trumps money and assets.
Who is to receive the 250 million??? No one lost anything. The state, I suppose, and surely the judge and the prosecutor will get substantial shares tax free.
Agreed. In New York, cases in equity fall under the rubric of nonjury (bench) trials. Also, motions for summary judgement or partial summary judgment are common.
What does Hoff have to do with it? He linked to Bloomberg. Posted videos of other lawyers. Most GP stories are linked from other sites.
Why do some people want stories hidden?