DOJ avoided prosecuting this particular January 6 participant because he was a federal employee. Many other participants, who did the exact same thing as this guy, were prosecuted.

Twitter ^ | March 22, 2024 | Daniel Alman from Squirrel Hill @DanielAlmanPGH

[grundle]

DOJ avoided prosecuting this particular January 6 participant because he was a federal employee.

Many other participants, who did the exact same thing as this guy, were prosecuted.

https://bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-03-22/treasury-employee-investigated-for-jan-6-capitol-riot-appearance

https://headlineusa.com/doj-declined-to-prosecute-treasury-depts-employee-who-stormed-capitol-on-j6/

#January6th #Trump #News #Politics #January6

[FreedomPoster]

More two-tier justice.

[Mark]

Thank you liberals for giving conservatives NEW TOOLS.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Plant.

[kiryandil]

"The District of Selective Prosecution of The Republican Enemy"

[joshua c]

no mention of his name

[Vaduz]

Yes

DOJ = Owned

[sauropod]

.

[combat_boots]

Name

[thinden]

I thought it would be a ray epps article

[HollyB]

The report

https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rIHq1OIdy1Jo/v0

[The Free Engineer]

“Entered the building with a loaded firearm in their bag”.
Prosecutor choose not to charge.
Some animals are indeed more equal.

[HollyB]

It wasn’t during 1/6. It looks like she resigned instead of getting fired.
Not a bright move on her part.