Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
I would add:

1a. MrLeRoy posted almost exclusively anti-WOD or pro-legalization articles.
1b. The large majority of the anti-WOD or pro-legalization articles were posted by MrLeRoy.

As to "promoting drug use", that's a tough call. Stating that Congress doesn't have the authority, or that this should be a states issue, or that some drugs should be decriminalized, or that medical marijuana is a legitimate issue, that's one thing.

But going on and on, post after post, article after article, I can see where, maybe, one gets the impression that this is starting to look like "promotion".

If I said (insert NAMBLA activity here) should be legal, and I posted numerous articles about it, and I always responded positively to it in my posts, I daresay I'd be catagorized as "promoting" it.

142 posted on 11/25/2003 9:02:20 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Promotion of a legalization agenda is political advocacy; my understanding is that this site allows that, but have been wrong before.

Promotion of personal use/abuse is not political advocacy, and I've never seen him urge anyone to do drugs.

143 posted on 11/25/2003 9:43:15 AM PST by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson