To: yankeedame
Their dog isn't trained (I assume) and now they want to sue?
Why am I not surprised?
2 posted on
01/03/2004 1:15:26 PM PST by
annyokie
(One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
01/03/2004 1:15:52 PM PST by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: yankeedame
dachshunds can jump?
4 posted on
01/03/2004 1:16:21 PM PST by
fnord
(Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence)
To: yankeedame
No soliciting means no soliciting... If it hadn't been for that little bit of info, I'd say sh*t happens.
6 posted on
01/03/2004 1:18:04 PM PST by
WinOne4TheGipper
(This tagline has been timed to best benefit George W. Bush.)
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Just damn.If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
8 posted on
01/03/2004 1:21:58 PM PST by
mhking
(My brother and I had never seen The Belt........but we had heard about it....)
To: yankeedame
The couple maintain there are signs at their house saying they do not want circulars.Let's see, owners of a property post signs indicating they do not want circulars; someone takes it upon themselves to ignore these signs. Perhaps actions do have consequences.
9 posted on
01/03/2004 1:26:49 PM PST by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: yankeedame
The article doesn't indicate whether the doggy's health was the reason they didn't want circulars.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson