Skip to comments.
Frequent Ejaculations May Counter Prostate Cancer
Reuters via Yahoo ^
| 4-6-04
| Michael Conlon
Posted on 04/06/2004 1:46:56 PM PDT by Pharmboy
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Sexual activity does not cause prostate cancer, and men who ejaculate frequently may even be protecting themselves against the disease, U.S. researchers reported on Tuesday.
The study, which involved more than 29,000 healthy men and covered sex of all kinds including masturbation and nocturnal emissions, confirms a smaller Australian study from last July that reached similar conclusions, the authors said.
Most of the previous research into the question was on whether sexual frequency caused prostate cancer, on the theory that increased production of the male hormone testosterone could prompt prostate cell growth, the study's chief author, Michael Leitzmann, said in an interview.
But the new research found that "ejaculation frequency is not related to an increased risk. There is no adverse effect. And ... higher elevations of ejaculation appear to protect men from developing prostate cancer," said Leitzmann, a physician and investigator at the National Cancer Institute.
The study suggested that frequent ejaculations may decrease the concentration of "chemical carcinogens which readily accumulate in prostatic fluid" and may reduce the development of crystalloids "which have been associated with prostate cancer in some."
The prostate is a small gland that produces some of the fluid for semen. Prostate cancer is the second most common kind of cancer (after skin cancer) diagnosed among U.S. men, and is highly survivable if caught in time.
The new study, published in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association, was based on an ongoing survey covering a variety of health issues of thousands of men who were 40 to 75 when the study began in 1986. In 1992 they were asked to report the average number of ejaculations they had per month during ages 20 to 29, 40 to 49 and during the previous year. In later surveys they were asked to report if they had been diagnosed with prostate cancer.
The earlier Australian study published in July 2003 by the Cancer Council Victoria found that the more often men ejaculated between the ages of 20 and 50, the less likely they were to suffer from prostate cancer.
That survey, which covered 1,079 prostate cancer patients and 1,259 healthy men, found that those who had sex at least once a day in their 20s were a third less likely to develop the malady.
"The more you flush the ducts out, the less there is to hang around and damage the cells that line them," Graham Giles, lead author of the earlier study said at the time.
Leitzmann said his new study is consistent with the Australian findings, and may even be stronger because it tracked men over time rather than asking them to recall ejaculation frequency only after they had already been diagnosed with cancer.
That kind of recall can be distorted, he said, because the cancer brings diminished sexual activity with it.
TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: atleastonceaday; clipandsave; flushtheductsout; frequent; nocturnalpasting; preventcancer; prostate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-57 next last
"Hi honey, I'm home, and take a look at this important health item."
1
posted on
04/06/2004 1:46:57 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
You have a headache? Are you trying to kill me?
2
posted on
04/06/2004 1:48:35 PM PDT
by
keyesguy
To: Pharmboy
Expecting an e-mail from Mr. Gun containing this link any minute now....
To: Pharmboy
"They all laughed at my bulk ordering of KY lubricant...well who's laughing now?!?!?"
4
posted on
04/06/2004 1:48:49 PM PDT
by
motzman
(Kerry: His slogan is a slogan about the inadequacy of slogans.)
To: Pharmboy

"But Officer, I have a note from my doctor..."
5
posted on
04/06/2004 1:48:56 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Pharmboy
Duh. I'm looking after hubby's prostate health for my selfish benefit.
6
posted on
04/06/2004 1:49:16 PM PDT
by
annyokie
(There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
To: Pharmboy
One way or another, I'm good to go.
7
posted on
04/06/2004 1:49:33 PM PDT
by
12B
To: Pharmboy; anniegetyourgun
ROFLMAO!
8
posted on
04/06/2004 1:49:42 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(I'm a monthy donor..........wouldn't you like to be a monthly donor, too?)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Pharmboy
How do you define 'frequent'?
10
posted on
04/06/2004 1:50:28 PM PDT
by
petercooper
(It's obvious, common sense is not prerequisite to voting rights.)
To: martin_fierro
Humor ping.
11
posted on
04/06/2004 1:50:34 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Pharmboy
Bump to read to hubby.
To: Howlin
Does this mean I'll be a prostate healthy blind man?
13
posted on
04/06/2004 1:51:45 PM PDT
by
umgud
(speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
To: Pharmboy

She's a cancer-fightin' mamma...
14
posted on
04/06/2004 1:52:05 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
To: Pharmboy
Use or lose! :)
15
posted on
04/06/2004 1:52:16 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: petercooper
How do you define 'frequent'? ...three times a day.
16
posted on
04/06/2004 1:53:01 PM PDT
by
Migraine
(my grain is pretty straight today)
To: motzman
Great...all be need is a bunch of old blind men.
To: Pharmboy
It's about time they got a handle on this problem.
To: Pharmboy; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Look, health news.......
To: Pharmboy
There is no adverse effect. And ... higher elevations of ejaculation appear to protect men from developing prostate cancer So, does this mean Liddy Dole didn't put out for poor Bob?
20
posted on
04/06/2004 1:56:51 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: Pharmboy
"The more you flush the ducts out, the less there is to hang around and damage the cells that line them," Hello Sweetie, come flush my ducts...
:-)
21
posted on
04/06/2004 1:58:12 PM PDT
by
demlosers
(Coulter: Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying.)
To: Pharmboy

Product labelling is so important.
22
posted on
04/06/2004 1:59:43 PM PDT
by
kidd
To: Pharmboy
Talk about a "win-win" proposition!
23
posted on
04/06/2004 2:00:16 PM PDT
by
Tailgunner Joe
(Kerry: "Well, he is sort of a phony, isn't he?")
To: Pharmboy
"Mom! Shut the door! I'm preventing cancer!!"
24
posted on
04/06/2004 2:03:58 PM PDT
by
whd23
To: Support Free Republic
Wrong ad for this thread...
To: Pharmboy
The study suggested that frequent ejaculations may decrease the concentration of "chemical carcinogens which readily accumulate in prostatic fluid" and may reduce the development of crystalloids "which have been associated with prostate cancer in some."
New Study finds the woman is the recipient of the chemical carcinogens and is the one to get cancer. GREAT!
26
posted on
04/06/2004 2:04:46 PM PDT
by
sonserae
To: 12B
I'm printing this and taking it home.
To: Pharmboy
I'd email this to my wife, but I think the title would get it caught by my wife's spam filter.
28
posted on
04/06/2004 2:21:01 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: 2Trievers; albee; annyokie; Augustus McCrae; Bloody Sam Roberts; Born Conservative; BraveMan; ...
"Frequent Ejaculations May Counter Prostate Cancer!" he ejaculated.
| Couldn't even THINK of a suitable graphic for here. |

 |
No amateurs, please. Send FReepmail if you want on/off ISHP list |
"Frequent Ejaculations May Counter Prostate Cancer!""Frequent Ejaculations May Counter Prostate Cancer!"
(jus' tryin' to stay healthy here)
To: martin_fierro
ROTFLMAO....
To: Pharmboy; xsmommy
Thanks for the reminder.... I think my annual therapy is coming up any day now.
To: umgud
Does this mean I'll be a prostate healthy blind man? A prostate healthy blind man WITH HAIRY PALMS!
33
posted on
04/06/2004 3:23:33 PM PDT
by
Born Conservative
(It really sucks when your 15 minutes of fame comes AFTER you're gone...)
To: martin_fierro; .45MAN
I'm totally speechless.....
Oh, .45MAN....some good news! :-)
34
posted on
04/06/2004 3:28:37 PM PDT
by
dansangel
(Do your part to drive the 'rats to distraction - You *too* can be a monthly donor!)
To: martin_fierro
Couldn't even THINK of a suitable graphic for here
To: Pharmboy; SeeRushToldU_So; TexasCowboy; Dog Gone; Argh; dubyaismypresident; Shooter 2.5; ...
I really wanted to ping all of my blind, hairy palmed friends to this thread - but as a lady, I will refrain from doing so.........
To: Pharmboy
bttt
37
posted on
04/06/2004 4:48:38 PM PDT
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: eddie willers
LOL
There ya go
To: eddie willers

I knew that eventually something would, er, come.
To: Pharmboy
I was told this by my doctor several years ago when I told her of my family history of prostate problems. By the way, she looks like Bebe Neuwirth.
To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
"I really wanted to ping all of my blind, hairy palmed friends to this thread - but as a lady, I will refrain from doing so........."But I noticed you pinged ME!!
To: Clint Williams
Wrong ad for this thread...LOL! Moderator pulled the "Support Free Republic ad"!!!!
To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Wait until I tell my wife that I'm supposed to either seduce her or a bar of soap. I'm a dead man.
43
posted on
04/06/2004 5:36:15 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: TexasCowboy
Oh yea, so I did.......;^)
To: Dog Gone
LOL.... in the interest of good health I'll send you a case of soap......
To: martin_fierro; mikrofon
Cancer Prevention Week in my house means seven times a year.
To: Charles Henrickson; martin_fierro
"But... but honey, I did it to improve my health -- that's why it's called prostatution, isn't it?"
48
posted on
04/06/2004 8:43:41 PM PDT
by
mikrofon
(Getting older and blinder for no good reason...)
To: Pharmboy
I'm fighting cancer, and fighting it very very fast...
49
posted on
04/06/2004 8:53:09 PM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(I havn't seen my therapist in 5 years. Neither has anyone else ;0))
To: Pharmboy
I'm sure there must be some comment about Sentaor Kerry's prostate health and this news item, but I don't want to think too much about it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson