Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frequent Ejaculations May Counter Prostate Cancer
Reuters via Yahoo ^ | 4-6-04 | Michael Conlon

Posted on 04/06/2004 1:46:56 PM PDT by Pharmboy

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Sexual activity does not cause prostate cancer, and men who ejaculate frequently may even be protecting themselves against the disease, U.S. researchers reported on Tuesday.

The study, which involved more than 29,000 healthy men and covered sex of all kinds including masturbation and nocturnal emissions, confirms a smaller Australian study from last July that reached similar conclusions, the authors said.

Most of the previous research into the question was on whether sexual frequency caused prostate cancer, on the theory that increased production of the male hormone testosterone could prompt prostate cell growth, the study's chief author, Michael Leitzmann, said in an interview.

But the new research found that "ejaculation frequency is not related to an increased risk. There is no adverse effect. And ... higher elevations of ejaculation appear to protect men from developing prostate cancer," said Leitzmann, a physician and investigator at the National Cancer Institute.

The study suggested that frequent ejaculations may decrease the concentration of "chemical carcinogens which readily accumulate in prostatic fluid" and may reduce the development of crystalloids "which have been associated with prostate cancer in some."

The prostate is a small gland that produces some of the fluid for semen. Prostate cancer is the second most common kind of cancer (after skin cancer) diagnosed among U.S. men, and is highly survivable if caught in time.

The new study, published in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association, was based on an ongoing survey covering a variety of health issues of thousands of men who were 40 to 75 when the study began in 1986. In 1992 they were asked to report the average number of ejaculations they had per month during ages 20 to 29, 40 to 49 and during the previous year. In later surveys they were asked to report if they had been diagnosed with prostate cancer.

The earlier Australian study published in July 2003 by the Cancer Council Victoria found that the more often men ejaculated between the ages of 20 and 50, the less likely they were to suffer from prostate cancer.

That survey, which covered 1,079 prostate cancer patients and 1,259 healthy men, found that those who had sex at least once a day in their 20s were a third less likely to develop the malady.

"The more you flush the ducts out, the less there is to hang around and damage the cells that line them," Graham Giles, lead author of the earlier study said at the time.

Leitzmann said his new study is consistent with the Australian findings, and may even be stronger because it tracked men over time rather than asking them to recall ejaculation frequency only after they had already been diagnosed with cancer.

That kind of recall can be distorted, he said, because the cancer brings diminished sexual activity with it.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: atleastonceaday; clipandsave; flushtheductsout; frequent; nocturnalpasting; preventcancer; prostate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
"Hi honey, I'm home, and take a look at this important health item."
1 posted on 04/06/2004 1:46:57 PM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
You have a headache? Are you trying to kill me?
2 posted on 04/06/2004 1:48:35 PM PDT by keyesguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Expecting an e-mail from Mr. Gun containing this link any minute now....
3 posted on 04/06/2004 1:48:36 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"They all laughed at my bulk ordering of KY lubricant...well who's laughing now?!?!?"
4 posted on 04/06/2004 1:48:49 PM PDT by motzman (Kerry: His slogan is a slogan about the inadequacy of slogans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

"But Officer, I have a note from my doctor..."

5 posted on 04/06/2004 1:48:56 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Duh. I'm looking after hubby's prostate health for my selfish benefit.
6 posted on 04/06/2004 1:49:16 PM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
One way or another, I'm good to go.
7 posted on 04/06/2004 1:49:33 PM PDT by 12B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; anniegetyourgun
ROFLMAO!
8 posted on 04/06/2004 1:49:42 PM PDT by Howlin (I'm a monthy donor..........wouldn't you like to be a monthly donor, too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Pharmboy
How do you define 'frequent'?
10 posted on 04/06/2004 1:50:28 PM PDT by petercooper (It's obvious, common sense is not prerequisite to voting rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Humor ping.
11 posted on 04/06/2004 1:50:34 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Bump to read to hubby.
12 posted on 04/06/2004 1:51:24 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Does this mean I'll be a prostate healthy blind man?
13 posted on 04/06/2004 1:51:45 PM PDT by umgud (speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

She's a cancer-fightin' mamma...

14 posted on 04/06/2004 1:52:05 PM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Use or lose! :)
15 posted on 04/06/2004 1:52:16 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petercooper
How do you define 'frequent'?

...three times a day.

16 posted on 04/06/2004 1:53:01 PM PDT by Migraine (my grain is pretty straight today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: motzman
Great...all be need is a bunch of old blind men.
17 posted on 04/06/2004 1:53:34 PM PDT by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
It's about time they got a handle on this problem.
18 posted on 04/06/2004 1:53:58 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Look, health news.......
19 posted on 04/06/2004 1:55:30 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (Go figure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
There is no adverse effect. And ... higher elevations of ejaculation appear to protect men from developing prostate cancer

So, does this mean Liddy Dole didn't put out for poor Bob?

20 posted on 04/06/2004 1:56:51 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson