Replies

I think I corrected myself on that at some point (yes, I have read the news articles this morning), if I didn't correct it, I'm sorry. Also, while we have SEVEN out of the 12, I don't see what difference it makes, or how it is connected.

As to Hoagland.... I have nothing against his ideas in general. My personal beef with him is something I won't go into here. I've spent a lot of time "debunking" him on several issues though, and I'm right, he's wrong. That's all there is to say about it. I've dealt with him personally, and his "ethics" leaves something to be desired. I will NOT say that his ideas are "stupid". He might, after all be RIGHT. But, I WILL say we will never KNOW if is he right, one way or the other without physically visiting Mars and LOOKING with human eyes ourselves, for those things he 'sees' there.

As for Stanton Friedman, I've talked at length with him as well, about various things related to the UFO world. I believe he has some very good data (TOP SECRET: Majestic book about "The Majestic 12") and I wouldn't put him off as being a kook either. At least he, in direct comparison to Hoagland has his SCIENCE right. Hoagland on the other hand relies on a lot of non-scientific explanations, "Masonic relationships" and other nonsense stuff about hyperdimensional physics that can't actually be proven.

bttt

I think I corrected myself on that at some point (yes, I have read the news articles this morning), if I didn't correct it, I'm sorry. Also, while we have SEVEN out of the 12, I don't see what difference it makes, or how it is connected.

I don't see any connection either, especially since I do not believe that the asteroid strike is real at all- a point that I made in several previous posts. It is either some kind of big new FleetEx as it claims, or something is brewing somewhere and we're sending someone a message.