Replies

One more post about this as I go back through the material...

Again, his source informed him that April 16th will be the date that future events will be confirmed The following day, March 23rd, an amateur astronomer in Australia discovered an inbound comet (named Bradfield after the astronomer who discovered it) and it was racing toward the sun. Funny thing is, during the time that this meteor is nearing the sun, two additional meteors will be visible to the naked eye as well, two of them even more visible than the famous Haley's comet. Strange I thought how there has been little, if any mention about these 3 comets that would be visible in April and May?

this last statement (regarding it not being mentioned) is absolutely false. At least two magazines I read (Sky and Telescope, and Astronomy I believe they were, I dont have them in front of me at the moment, so I will have to verify it later) have long articles about these comets. There have been posts in the astronomy community for MONTHS prior to these two comets becoming visible enough for small scopes to see. (*I have an 8" reflector, rather large as scopes go for amateurs, though I know others with MUCH bigger telescopes).. I've been able to see the comets for the most part with ease. One of them anyway, very well, the other I've not actually observed yet, since every time I tried the seeing was bad.

A few days before the 16th, the individual who started the thread posted that he was personally being "pinged" by NASA, and had threats sent to him telling him to stop sharing classified information. Then, his post stopped. This is EXTREMELY TYPICAL of these so-called conspiracy folks. They talk awhile, then when they get tired of it, or things aren't working out the way they wanted it to work out, they move on. Usually it is a "threat" from some "government entity" that makes them "stop posting" and "vanish forever". They come back under another name, soon enough.

Al Franken saying that Bush was more concerned with "meteors" than with terrorists.

We all know that when Al Franken talks we should listen too, lol!

Information that says the ham intercept "Snowball" message could indeed be valid, and supersedes other operations in immediacy and importance (a whole other article could be written about this topic) Increasing news surfacing about events in space, all in the last few months.

I spend last night and very early this morning before I started work, looking for just such information. There is NOTHING out there on the internet in regards to this particular intercepted conversation that I can find except on the two or three sites that are being used to point this information out. At this point, I have NOT found a copy of the recording, so I can't listen to it myself, I can't find an original location for this material (apparently the site is DOWN???) and no one really knows who the original author is. It's all pretty suspect to me. Also, a few years back we had a similar thing happen (the details of which are sketchy in my mind right now) and a "ham radio operator" and a "recorded conversation" was involved. I remember getting involved in the beginning of it, but quickly determined somehow that it was all a hoax. I just can't remember the details right (this was probably about 10-15 years ago now). I'm wondering if this isn't the same story, just re-written now.

First indications of that are that they are a diminishing on pinpoint accuracy of locations. My company's locating parameters have already been slowly widening 500 feet so far. Delta Airlines just announced a "computer glitch" that has grounded their planes but I suspect that they are starting to have problems with their GPS system.

My GPS is reading just fine. Has been. Hasn't changed, I check it every day or two. It's remained with in a few fractions of a few feet either way. Hmmmm I do not see any evidence of this occuring.

Anyway, in mid July the "pellets" arrive. These are the first and second "Events" alluded to by the earlier poster. You see he HAS to word things so that you read them between the lines so as not to go ´over the line´ of divulging confidential information sworn not to, upon his retirement, which he really hasn't thus far.

Wait and see. Also, "Sworn to secrecy".. hmmm. All of us are "sworn to secrecy"... but we don't go "talking around" secrets either to "get the message across without saying it" either. You either know something, or you don't. If you talk about it, you're in trouble. If you don't then who knows what you know, except you? Retired huh? I won't say anything more about that, now.

A Large asteroid passes between our Moon and the Earth which causes havoc here even ´thought to be able to "peel" the upper stratosphere "Snowballing" Earth. Extremely doubtful... no "peeling" will occur. It would have to be VERY large, and VERY close and we'd already be feeling the effects of such a thing, long before it got here. Tidal variations would be noticable already.

Also, if it were that BIG we'd probably get HIT because the gravity would cause a near miss or a collision. A smaller chunk of rock, stripping the atmosphere? Nawww

Finally, the sources of the articles....http://www.rense.com/, http://www.godlikeproductions.com/, and http://www.timebomb2000.com/ are all, in my mind somewhat questionable "sources". Two of them are news sites. Rense, Jeff Rense, that is a RABID anti-Bush, anti-government kind of guy. He is about as leftist as they come, and spouts so much nonsense sometimes that it's difficult to get a clear understanding of what he is trying to say. He has on several occasions attacked anyone and anything that has anything credible to say about anything at all. He posts material on his site that has NO sources usually, or refuses to show any citations for sources of material, and in most cases is talking to hear himself talk. The other two sites are similar to survival web sites that have been around for years, touting the same things... the end of the world. In other words, ALL of this material, if it is coming from just these three sites is probably bogus information. While I can't say that the posters on Bushcountry (the original author tha wanted his name left off) are not doing their best, given the circumstances, I WILL say that people leaving their names off of articles because of a PERCEIVED THREAT is about the LAMEST excuse I've ever heard and it's used so often it's becoming cliche.

I would advise that anyone refusing to give a name, show some accurate data and proof is simply obfuscating his or her TRUE agenda. The original story teller ought to be coming forward, and not THREE days before, but now, today. Spill his or her guts about this, and tell the truth. But, I bet they won't. -- Rick