Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Olympians posing nude, poses questions
ESPN online ^ | 8/23/04 | Laura Boswell

Posted on 08/24/2004 7:36:29 AM PDT by TheBigB

They crush balls into the court, swim faster than Flipper and punish their competition with the ferocity of Lindsay Lohan's dad at a family reunion.

If you weren't tuning in already, now you are.But stand them next to one another in white bikinis and suddenly they are tender, demure, and innocent. They cradle one another's taut waists and gently caress the smalls of eachother's backs. So pure, so sweet, so loving ...

So full of it.

Nice try, but we can still see power behind those pouts. They're female Olympians, and just as they are dominating their respective sports, they'll dominate every guy's dreams until Beijing 2008.

That's exactly what they want.

And I say, good for them ... I think.

We're here, great rears -- get used to it! America's best female athletes have come to a magazine stand near you. Or rather, the best female athletes who also happen to be tall, tan and toned.

Five Team USA women, including volleyball player Logan Tom and swimmer Amanda Beard, currently grace the cover of FHM's September issue and are featured in its "Sexy Olympic Special."

High jumper and Barbie reincarnation Amy Acuff, who also appears in FHM, fittingly set her bar even higher as Playboy's September cover girl. In its "Women of the Olympics" pictorial, Acuff is one of eight female Olympians who chose to bare all for the cameras.

Surprisingly, unlike similar escapades of the past -- think Katarina Witt -- there hasn't been too much flak accompanying Acuff's decision to pose nude. It seems like the higher authorities, including the USOC, are giving the matter a collective shrug and moving on to other problems (like how to get as many eyeballs in the stands).

Meanwhile, the athletes' responses have been gleefully defiant.

Of course I'm concerned that by posing nude or nearly so, these athletes might be "selling out." And I'm concerned that they're actions might be undoing previous strides mades for women in terms of earning respect as athletes. But mostly, I'm concerned because I'm really not all that concerned.

As a woman, and former college athlete, I should be more affected and have stronger opinions on this topic. And looking around, I can't help but wonder why others aren't more upset as well.

Has American culture come to this? Are sex and sports so commonly intertwined that FHM and Playboy have essentially become a sexier version of a Wheaties box?

I guess so.

But it's tough to judge these women without walking a mile in their um ... bikinis.

Logan Tom is no dummy, she's a Stanford grad.Cover girls or gaffes? Collectively, female athletes finally seem to be demanding their due, even if it means copping to the old adage "sex sells."

And why not? They're expected to be aggressive in their chosen sport. Why shouldn't that translate into their self-marketing efforts as well?

This particularly holds true for Olympians who don't see the endorsement dollars of higher-profile sports. It's not uncommon for Olympians to toil in obscurity and poverty to fulfill their dreams. Stories like that of gymnast Mohini Bhardwaj, who sacrificed by eating Power Bars and delivering pizzas during training, are all too common.

Ironically, were it not for a $20,000 check from pin-up girl Pamela Anderson, Bhardwaj may have not made it to Athens.

As far as the casual viewer is concerned, sports like gymnastics, volleyball and swimming come around once every four years. So, if not for the additional exposure, would you even recognize Amanda Beard if you saw her walking down the street?

At best, you might say, "Hey, isn't that the girl ... who did something ... athletic?"

After hanging up their sneakers, some Olympians aspire to be fulltime models. On her personal website, Acuff displays her modeling portfolio right next to her high jump stats.

And this is not a "male athletes get more money and attention than girls" thing. In fact, in this case, the women actually have a rare, albeit dubious, advantage over the fellas.

Today's female athlete can land just as many traditional corporate marketing deals as the guys, but for men, modeling outlets are pretty much limited to pseudo-sexy spreads like People's "50 Most Eligible Bachelors." There is no male counterpart to Playboy, unless you're counting Playgirl and that's just .... eeewww!

Sure, Michael Phelps is set for life but ... Quick! Name a member of the men's water polo team.

Nope, I can't either.

On a slow sports day, you could probably catch a televised beach volleyball game, but for the most part, to anyone outside that sport's community, Stein Metzger and Dax Holdren are just exceptionally tall guys who have to eat and pay the rent just like you and me.

Both male and female Olympians have small windows of opportunity in which to market themselves. They have to strike hard and fast -- even if the target is somewhat questionable. Otherwise, they're one sprained ankle or missed landing away from delivering pizzas and dreaming of what could have been.

Brandi Chastain brought jog bras to every guy's attention.Buff and beautiful Let's not forget that these female Olympians have some rock solid justifications for their cover girl aspirations -- starting with their six-pack abs and moving outward to just about every other toned and sculpted muscle on their bodies.

They have busted their butts, both literally and figuratively to get to the Games and the results can not be disputed. Unlike waif-like runway models, their bodies are trained, healthy and (somewhat) attainable. They're all sport and no silicone.

Why shouldn't they shake what their mamas (and 1,000 crunches a day) gave 'em?

And they're preconditioned to be comfortable in their own skin; their "uniforms" are swimsuits, bikinis, and leotards. So, it's not much of a stretch to pose in similarly "suggestive" attire.

I still don't understand why a big deal was made of Brandi Chastain pulling off her shirt after the U.S. women won the 1999 World Cup. A sports bra is a common sight at the gym and/or the local park. It's about as risqué as a sweatsock!

But here's the real deal: Whether it's guised as "an honor" or as a "boost for your sport," secretly the ability to pose for photos wearing blush instead of Ben-Gay, is also a great, big power trip. International attention is flattering, exciting and somewhat intoxicating, particularly on a sexy, not sandy stage.

These athletes have sacrificed and worked hard their entire lives. They've forgone proms and parties for practice. It's difficult to fault them for wanting to strut their stuff and say, "Hey, check me out!"

Who wouldn't want to get all gussied up and airbrushed, and get paid big bucks for it? And that goes for the guys too!

Matter of choice Kerri Walsh is 6-foot-3, beautiful and whip thin. She is also the "world's best beach volleyball player." Walsh declined the magazine shoots. And I also say, good for her.

Walsh claims that she's a "terrible poser" and stated that the FHM cover is "really positive for athletes," but I can't help but respect her decision regardless of her reasoning.

No matter how I try to justify it, there's still something off about America's top female athletes being glamorized for their looks.

They're strong, smart, athletic and beautiful, and as a result, they're desirable. But there's still something inside me that believes being an Olympic athlete should be enough to stand on its own merits, and that Olympians belong on Wheaties boxes and not in men's magazines.

Ultimately, I've got to turn the question on myself: If I could fit into one of those bikinis would I do it?

Hell, yeah!


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: olympics; sluts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
Time for a good nudity thread. :^)

Logan Tom

FHM cover

1 posted on 08/24/2004 7:36:29 AM PDT by TheBigB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

yet I still refuse to watch the olympics.


2 posted on 08/24/2004 7:39:13 AM PDT by escapefromboston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; Constitution Day; Tijeras_Slim; martin_fierro; Owl_Eagle; Dead Dog; sathers; Cooter; ...
RPR PING!

What is the Republican Party Reptile? It is a creature of the eighties. It's neoconservatism with its pants down around its ankles, the Rehnquist Supreme Court on drugs, a disco Hobbes living without shame or federally mandated safety regulations. The Republican Party Reptile supports a strong defense policy, but sees no reason to conduct it while sober. The RPR believes in minimum government interference in private affairs;unless the government brings over extra girls and some ice. In short, the RPR is the new label that our political spectrum has been crying out for; the conservative with a sense of humor and a healthy dose of depravity.

3 posted on 08/24/2004 7:39:16 AM PDT by TheBigB (Sure wish -I- had one'a them anti-shrew barrels...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

4 posted on 08/24/2004 7:43:56 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Way more interesting than silicone bimbos…


5 posted on 08/24/2004 7:49:55 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Oi! I demand equality.

Where are the pics of the hot guys? :-)


6 posted on 08/24/2004 7:51:41 AM PDT by Happygal (Liberals - fully au fait with their 'rights', utterly ignorant of their responsibilities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

Those legs are like, six feet long...


7 posted on 08/24/2004 7:51:47 AM PDT by TheBigB (Sure wish -I- had one'a them anti-shrew barrels...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

Start your own thread! *snicker* :-)


8 posted on 08/24/2004 7:52:22 AM PDT by TheBigB (Sure wish -I- had one'a them anti-shrew barrels...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Don't have me ruin this thread, by posting Helen Thomas pictures gratuitously! ;-)


9 posted on 08/24/2004 7:53:31 AM PDT by Happygal (Liberals - fully au fait with their 'rights', utterly ignorant of their responsibilities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

So where's all this nudity then?

It might be a British thing, but frankly I prefer my filth a little more filthy than this!

Disappointed of London.


10 posted on 08/24/2004 7:55:29 AM PDT by BritishBulldog (New Labour - Putting the "National" back into "Socialist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Sheesh. Okay, okay. Paul Hamm?

11 posted on 08/24/2004 7:57:57 AM PDT by TheBigB (Sure wish -I- had one'a them anti-shrew barrels...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BritishBulldog

Several posed in the new PLAYBOY. However, those pics ain't getting posted, as I have no desire to get banned. Ask Presidio9. he's used to it. :^)


12 posted on 08/24/2004 7:58:51 AM PDT by TheBigB (Sure wish -I- had one'a them anti-shrew barrels...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

He'll do as an appetiser! ;-)


13 posted on 08/24/2004 7:59:56 AM PDT by Happygal (Liberals - fully au fait with their 'rights', utterly ignorant of their responsibilities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
They crush balls into the court,

Ouch!

14 posted on 08/24/2004 8:01:02 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

A little Hamm is okay, but this thread will not become a sausage-fest. ;-)


15 posted on 08/24/2004 8:01:11 AM PDT by TheBigB (Sure wish -I- had one'a them anti-shrew barrels...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

I only read these threads for the articles. I hardly even look at the pictures.


16 posted on 08/24/2004 8:02:12 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

I will be hitting the "refresh" button on this thread often today.


17 posted on 08/24/2004 8:03:47 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
but this thread will not become a sausage-fest. ;-)

No buns either, I suppose! *sigh* ;-)

18 posted on 08/24/2004 8:05:13 AM PDT by Happygal (Liberals - fully au fait with their 'rights', utterly ignorant of their responsibilities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

I won't be satisfied until the beach volleyball dancers from "Personal Plus" are given the chance to pose too.

No justice, no peace!

19 posted on 08/24/2004 8:06:34 AM PDT by Constitution Day (...Reporting live from the Holy Barbecue City of Wilson, NC...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

20 posted on 08/24/2004 8:07:22 AM PDT by evets (God bless president George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson