Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: faithincowboys

So Kerry's team has a former POW claiming Kerry's testimony wasn't used to torture him? So what? That's doesn't begin to be proof that it wasn't used to torture ANY POW's.


39 posted on 09/09/2004 4:36:34 PM PDT by alnick (US forces armed with what? Spitballs??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: alnick

Exactly. These men are American heroes. The antiwar movement was absolutely used against them. If the Kerry people managed to flip that one, integrity free guy, that don't mean sh*t to me. Kerry is unfit for command, and if he gets elected, a lot of good man would suffer. Kerry is an unacceptable choice. He is a betrayer, a liar, a waffler and a self aggrandizing, purple heart poaching punk.


40 posted on 09/09/2004 4:40:30 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: alnick
Matthews' questions to Butler were like those posed by a defense attorney. They were narrowly tailored to whether Kerry's name was used by his captors against him. Butler said no.

However, Galanti has said he didn't know it was Kerry until after he was freed but that Kerry's testimony was used against them.

Butler apparently served his purpose and was asked no more questions after that brief round. It was odd, given his remark about really earning a purple heart that Matthews ignored.

48 posted on 09/09/2004 4:53:56 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson