Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Debate Observations...Why didn't Kerry let go after shaking hands?

Posted on 10/01/2004 7:59:40 AM PDT by 1Old Pro

The liberals are always too cute by half in debates.

Kerry refused to let go of the Presidents hand after the pre-debate handshake and greeting.

This forced the President to "pull away". You could see Kerry smirk as if he just got his first shot in before the debate even started in his attempt to get W. off-stride immediately.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: firstdebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2004 7:59:41 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I think F'n was just concentrating on how to pronounce Falluja and forgot to let go (and later forgot how to pronounce Falluja)


2 posted on 10/01/2004 8:01:43 AM PDT by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Why didn't Kerry let go after shaking hands?

He’s a little bit gay.

3 posted on 10/01/2004 8:02:56 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

He probably was contemplating a "HUG".....but decided against it.....


4 posted on 10/01/2004 8:03:40 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Main Stream Media == PRAVDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: craig_eddy
Kerry was upset that we spent 90% of the funds to liberate Iraq and we had 90% of the casualties.

Should someone remind him that we had 99% of the casualties on 9/11 and spent 99% of the funds to rebuild NYC after America was attacked? He just doesn't get it that WE were attacked and WE need to defend ourselves, not the U.N.

5 posted on 10/01/2004 8:04:32 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I saw an analyst on before the debate say to watch for just that from Kerry, evidently in order to emphasize Kerry's height advantage.


6 posted on 10/01/2004 8:04:56 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
He’s a little bit gay.

Creepy, I'll bet his hands were clamy too.

7 posted on 10/01/2004 8:05:15 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
I saw an analyst on before the debate say to watch for just that from Kerry, evidently in order to emphasize Kerry's height advantage.

Yep, he wanted to prolong standing next to Bush to increase his puny stature.

8 posted on 10/01/2004 8:06:03 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I noticed also that kerry, towering in height over the President, when handshaking, was much closer to Bush than most men prefer to be to one another, causing Bush to look up into kerry's face--no doubt the desired effect!


9 posted on 10/01/2004 8:06:14 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Should someone remind him that we had 99% of the casualties on 9/11...

I was waiting for the President to knock that one out of the park..........hopefully his campaign will start to use this rebuttal.

10 posted on 10/01/2004 8:06:23 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg
causing Bush to look up into kerry's face--no doubt the desired effect!

Like I said, it was preplanned....how juvenile.

11 posted on 10/01/2004 8:07:22 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I noticed that too. Kerry was being macho man. LOL

Kerry offered his usual relentless attacks against the President and endlessly challenged Bush`s credibility. Fine. Kerry offered no valid alternative to Bush`s foreign policy. Just more of the same rhetoric he's been spewing for months. More importantly, the President lost an opportunity to drive a death blow into the Kerry campaign. He didn't. He wasn't focused like many of his supporters thought he would be. Kerry frustrated Bush and that made the President very defensive for most of the debate.

Having said that, I believe the debate was a draw. Let's hope the President does a better job next week.

12 posted on 10/01/2004 8:10:52 AM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

What's with Kerry saying he wanted to be like a Regan man? Didn't he fight Reagan tooth and nail.


13 posted on 10/01/2004 8:13:20 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Kerry no doubt wanted everyone to get a gander at his superior height. An old, old psychological ploy.


14 posted on 10/01/2004 8:14:14 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The "90%" statistic came up a lot. Did you notice Kerry "lying with statistics" when he said "9/10 divisions are committed to Iraq. They're either coming, going, or preparing for Iraq"?

Think about this statement: if a division is LEAVING Iraq, are they still COMMITTED to Iraq? No, they're not. So why scare the American people with a false statistic?

15 posted on 10/01/2004 8:15:00 AM PDT by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: craig_eddy

Yes, I noticed those scare tactics. Kerry was awful.


16 posted on 10/01/2004 8:15:47 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Kerry's mention of Reagan was an appeal to the old Reagan Democrats. Problem is most of the Reagan Democrats became Reagan Republicans and the rest is history. In the 1980`s, Kerry did oppose Reagan's massive military buildup and wanted a nuclear freeze. Kerry wanted to further appease the USSR. Reagan won the Cold War and the rest is history.


17 posted on 10/01/2004 8:18:39 AM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: freedreamer

Did you just register at FR today, October 1, 2004??


19 posted on 10/01/2004 8:35:58 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson