Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: infidel29
be nuisances to the extent of keep calling and e-mailing until they HAVE to listen to it.

exactly.

after all, it's working for the "fraudulent voting" crowd, isn't it - with no evidence.

the Berger theft was to steal classified documents - presumably under orders by Clinton - that would show his actions - or non-actions in preventing the escalation of/capture of Osama...etc.

This is no petty theft - this is a crime, and Clintooon is complicit, it seems.

He's the one that must be held accountable - for ONCE.

We have the right to know if there's an ongoing investigation - and if not , why not...

33 posted on 11/11/2004 7:18:41 PM PST by maine-iac7 ( Pray without doubt..."Ask and you SHALL receive")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: maine-iac7

You`re absolutely right, Nixon had people break into dems HQ to get campaign info. That wasn`t the impeachable act, it was lying to the senate about it. Berger stole highly classified national security documents, far worse than some campaign info. Then said "oops, I just made a mistake with those documents" the problem was the documents he said he had weren`t the documents they said were missing. Meaning he took more than he admitted to. He even admitted to destroying some "accidentally". How can this not be headline news? I have been asking local radio shows why it isn`t being covered, but so far they don`t know either.


38 posted on 11/11/2004 7:25:08 PM PST by infidel29 (America is GREAT because she is GOOD, the moment she ceases to be GOOD, she ceases to be GREAT- B.F.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson