Posted on 11/29/2004 4:16:06 PM PST by cougar_mccxxi
Goerge W. Bush's victory was not as big as Ronald Reagan's in '84 but it was big enough to make one point certainly clear; socialists can not afford to reveal their true beliefs and lack of moral foundation during an election year. The voters of this country came out in record numbers to defeat the," true America" of Hollywood that John Kerry holds so dear. Voters obviously rejected the make believe world of utopian liberalism and the hypocracy that goes with it.
Another thing is quite clear as well; the democratic scare tactics worked like a boomerang. While trying to instill fear into voters to gain support the democrats found themselves scaring the hell out of poeple with their lack of morality, integrity and character. By running a campaign based upon hate and division the democratic party made the choice crystal clear in the minds of millions of American voters that cherish liberty, morality and integrity.
Ok, we all know this. Newbie, please dont vanity again for a long time.
Bears repeating...
2004; A Year Of Leftist Defeat
Loudly...
/john
Perhaps you might want to check my sign-up date. And I lurked for 2 years. And had proof.
/john
zahal724, what do you mean by, "dont vanity"? And the name calling is not necessary by the way. It is not the proper thing to do during an intelligent conversation.
These posts are getting annoying. They have not stopped since the election.
"Dont vanity" = Dont post a vanity, which is what this is
I thought you were a newbie because your sign up date is today.
This doesn't not have a link to a published article.
That would make it a vanity.
The poster should have posted: "Don't post a vain article" but it's not that smart.
Intel grows...
/john
zahal724, the definition of vain is, "something lacking substance or worth". I am flattered by your thoughtfulness concerning my view of the past election results.
when you post a "post", you have to give a category. this falls into VANITY! Ask any other FReeper.
Goerge W. Bush's victory was not as big as Ronald Reagan's in '84
Actually in one sense it was bigger. Reagan never had a Republican controlled Congress. Bush's side gained seats in BOTH houses. 1st time since 1936 that the sitting President's party gain seats in both houses.
The HOWEVER in all of that is Bush is building on Reagan's legacy. Without Reagan, doubtful that any of this would have happened
I never called you a newbie
Do I have to pick only one category?
Perhaps you might want to check my sign-up date. And I lurked for 2 years. And had proof
Yes, intresting that you have been on about 4 years long then the one calling you a "newbie".
Of course not, but this falls into VANITY.
As I said, you are a newbie. Not meant to be an insult - apparently it is true Just do comments on already posted things before you post articles.
Yes, the left is domininated by tiny minorites with tiny little selfish minds wich are so one track that YES THE REST OF THE POPULATION MUST ISOLATE AND EXPUNGE THEM.
I never said you did. Everything is intel.
/john
Nah. The left already lost. They aren't getting any anytime soon. Sorta like our guys overseas.
I suggest praying for them, changing the channel to FoxNews, and standing back from the uppercase frothing...
/john
We all need to stop picking on people for being newbies. We were all newbies once.
/john
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.