Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: antisocial
So you're saying that the US should be able to keep military installations in other countries without permission?

Leaving aside the entire question of whether South Carolina was another country or not, Sumter was the property of the federal government. Southern secession, even if legal, did not change that. Wouldn't it have made sense to negotiate the disposition of federal property in the southern states before the acts of secession?

And for the record we do keep military installations in other countries without their permission. It's called Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

29 posted on 12/16/2004 7:49:44 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

There were negotiations going on about the disposition of the US Ft.- Lincoln was overriding those by attempting to resupply the Fort.


36 posted on 12/16/2004 8:16:55 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
as usual, you are 100% wrong. GITMO is under long-term lease & has been for over 100 years. the Cubans cash the lease checks every year (it's a source of much needed dollars for them).

free dixie,sw

127 posted on 12/17/2004 9:01:05 PM PST by stand watie ( being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson