Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Fieschko

Cursive is useless. It requires the same low-tech equipment to produce as hand printing, and is harder to read. It is in the process of going extinct. I went through school before the computer age -- even in college many of my research papers were handprinted, rather than typed -- and haven't used cursive since early elementary school.


5 posted on 01/19/2005 10:38:48 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
Cursive is useless. It requires the same low-tech equipment to produce as hand printing, and is harder to read. It is in the process of going extinct. I went through school before the computer age -- even in college many of my research papers were handprinted, rather than typed -- and haven't used cursive since early elementary school.

Cursive, IIRC, developed as a writing style to avoid a specific problem with quill-style pens. Any time you put the pen down to the paper, you risk getting an ink blot. Cursive, by connecting all the letters in a smooth, flowing line, avoids some of the ink blots. I read a study a few months ago that found that a mixture of cursive and printed letters is the fastest and most common way of writing. Legibility is an issue with any writing system.

10 posted on 01/19/2005 11:52:18 AM PST by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson