Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sexy Man in Morgue (William L. Petersen, CSI dumpy heartthrob)(last nite's show was dumb!!)
SLATE ^ | Feb. 11 05 | Dana Stevens

Posted on 02/11/2005 9:53:02 AM PST by churchillbuff

Last night's show was stupid because they went through hours and hours of high-tech snooping to finally find out that murdered was the woman's stepmother -- and then, only at the end, did someone discover a motive: the stepmother would get millions as executor of the grandkid's estate. Well, why didn't they find out about financial implications of the death AT THE BEGINNING OF THE INVESTIGATION -- I guess that would have meant no need for hours of high-tech investigation to figure out a suspect, so no need for the entire episode.

The Sexiest Man in the Morgue William L. Petersen, the dumpy heartthrob of CSI. By Dana Stevens Posted Thursday, Feb. 10, 2005, at 2:14 PM PT

CSI: Crime Scene Investigation is one of the most watched shows on television. Is it also the most fantasized about? Like a forensic investigation exhuming a body, a simple Web search unearths a seething niche subculture of CSI: "fanfic," the often sexually explicit fiction written by fans that imagines TV characters living their lives in the interstitial moments between shows. Some of the literature spawned by CSI is "slash," or gay-themed, some is straight, but an inordinate amount of it focuses on the off-screen cavortings of Gil Grissom, the lead investigator played by William Petersen. For those of you who haven't watched the show, Gil is hardly the most obvious object of erotic longing; he's a gray-haired, slightly dumpy, middle-aged workaholic who probably smells faintly of formaldehyde, and whose social skills are inversely proportional to his forensic acumen. Whence the mystique? Why are so many people in love with Gil Grissom?

Grissom's closest analogue in TV history may be Star Trek's Mr. Spock

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.msn.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: csi

1 posted on 02/11/2005 9:53:02 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Cause its a tv show not real life


2 posted on 02/11/2005 9:54:02 AM PST by alchemist54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Let me correct my typos: They needed to do high-tech stuff, for hours and hours, to hit on a suspect. But simply checking the will at the outset would have pointed to the stepmother.


3 posted on 02/11/2005 9:55:16 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Why bother watching fictional forensic investigations when you can watch the real thing on Court TV and A&E, and occasionally Discovery Channel.


4 posted on 02/11/2005 9:58:13 AM PST by MisterRepublican (Liberalism kills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

No, it's even easier. My husband and I called it as soon as we saw the "mother" even before we knew she was a stepmother only we got the motive wrong... we thought she and the husband were having an affair but we knew she was evil.

And since I'm married to an engineer type I love the lab rat thing. I actually think he's more of a Moulder type although a bit older and chunkier.


5 posted on 02/11/2005 9:59:13 AM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: churchillbuff

What does this thread have to do with anything? Who gives a daM# about CSI? This should be removed...


7 posted on 02/11/2005 10:08:27 AM PST by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
What does this thread have to do with anything? Who gives a daM# about CSI? This should be removed...

This could be listed differently but I wouldn't spend an hour watching this. I saw a few of the 1st episodes, which were not bad but the theme & writing soon starts to disappear. Ergo reading this 30 second review saves the time of watching but keeps one informed.

8 posted on 02/11/2005 10:25:23 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I think that Gil Grissom guy is such a gorgeous, buff . . . Uh, wait a minute -- you mean this isn't HotGayMen.com?

Sorry 'bout that -- I guess I posted on the wrong site. I'll be back in a little while . . .

9 posted on 02/11/2005 10:26:10 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm not expecting to grow flowers in the desert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

CSI is frankly an early "shark jumper" for a major drama show. ER didn't jump the shark for quite a while. I will admit that CSI is a much more subtle shark jumper than ER. No helicopters have fallen on the investigators yet and no tanks have sent shells through the laboratory. But making someone gag and then sampling the results, or having an episode with 10,000 gunshots through the walls at the crime scene aren't serious.


10 posted on 02/11/2005 10:28:32 AM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
What does this thread have to do with anything? Who gives a daM# about CSI? This should be removed...

What does your post have anything to do with this thread?

This should be removed...

Do you want some cheese with your WHINE?

11 posted on 02/11/2005 10:42:53 AM PST by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alchemist54; churchillbuff; cyborg
...Sexy Man in Morgue...last nite's show was dumb!!...

Cause its a tv show not real life

That's true, but CSI likes to think it's more intelligent than that, and as a regular viewer, I have to agree that a simple question like that would not generally be overlooked. Unless it's a Feb sweeps month attempt at pointing out how having the original team, led by Peterson's character, is less effective since being split up by the new, evil director.

And I have to agree with the author, not only is Peterson sexy in his role, but most of the male characters are also very sexy. Not always in an obvious Brad Pitt kind of way, more in a subtle way, through their character's morals and attitudes and such, and, yes, appearance. Real substance, unusual for a TV show. And fun to watch for us ladies.

12 posted on 02/11/2005 10:43:24 AM PST by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Why bother watching fictional forensic investigations when you can watch the real thing on Court TV and A&E, and occasionally Discovery Channel.

Because those shows don't have George Eads (Nick Stokes);)

I watch those in the evening sometimes too. My favorite is on Court TV, Body of Evidence with Dayle Hinman. She's a brillant forensics investigator. I also like American Justice on A&E with Bill Kurtis.

13 posted on 02/11/2005 10:50:43 AM PST by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Gris is hot, Hot, HOT!


14 posted on 02/11/2005 11:04:47 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Ugh! CSI...terrible acting...ridiculous stories...unattractive characters...

Just the kind of stuff the Ignorant Masses love to watch. I should clarify I watched it once, and never again.


15 posted on 02/11/2005 11:50:40 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MotleyGirl70

For those who care, George Eads went to Texas Tech.


16 posted on 02/11/2005 6:36:33 PM PST by arjay (If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson