Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oscar Ratings Sink With Rock(Punk Rock Bombed Last Night!)
CNNMONEY ^ | 2/28/2005 | Krysten Crawford

Posted on 02/28/2005 3:09:29 PM PST by kellynla

Following in the footsteps of both The Golden Globes and Grammy Awards, ratings for Sunday night's 77th Annual Academy Awards were down this year.

Some 41.5 million viewers on average watched ABC's Oscar telecast this year, a 5 percent drop from 2004, according to Nielsen Media Research. The sweep by "Million Dollar Baby," the Clint Eastwood boxing flick that won four of the top six awards, drew a 25.2 rating and a 38 share, according to figures released Monday afternoon by ABC.

A rating represents the percentage of total U.S. television households. A share represents the percentage of homes with their televisions on at the time.

The numbers, released Monday afternoon, are lower than the preliminary returns widely reported earlier in the day. Monday morning ABC, which is owned by Walt Disney (Research), said ratings from the top U.S. markets showed a 30.1 rating and a 43 share.

Nielsen ratings can fluctuate until they are finalized. The data that ABC released Monday afternoon, while not official until Tuesday, are a lot closer to the mark than the earlier results.

While Oscar ratings for the last two years are higher than they were in 2003 -- when 33 million viewers tuned in to see "Chicago" shimmy its way to a best picture statue -- viewer levels over time show that Oscar is slowly losing his Midas touch.

Academy Award viewership has been sliding since 1998, when the blowout success of "Titanic" helped draw 55 million watchers, according to Nielsen. That year, in which "Titanic" hauled in 11 Oscars, marked the ceremony's best showing since 1983.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: academyawards; milliondollarbaby; oscar; ratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
"Million Dollar Dud" wins 4 out of 6 top awards? While Mel Gibson, who was shunned, is laughing all the way to the bank with a re-release of "The Passion" this month.
1 posted on 02/28/2005 3:09:31 PM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Hugh Hewitt taking apart Chris Rock's monologue at this moment.
2 posted on 02/28/2005 3:11:34 PM PST by socal_parrot (Tryin' to reason with El Nino season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

I like your tag line. Please tell our rain that all is forgiven and it can come back to Seattle.


3 posted on 02/28/2005 3:13:22 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
That year, in which "Titanic" hauled in 11 Oscars, marked the ceremony's best showing since 1983.

I bet a great deal of that 1983 audience tuned in that year to see if E.T., at that time the most popular film of all time, would win...it lost to Gandhi.
4 posted on 02/28/2005 3:15:15 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I was attacked on the live thread last night for citing this as drivel...looks like I wasnt't alone!


5 posted on 02/28/2005 3:18:01 PM PST by CT CONSERVATIVE (Fight Crime: Shoot Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I watched the beginning of the show just to hear Rock's opening monologue. Three minutes in and he praised F9/11 as a "great film" (applause from the libs), then in the next breath bashed Bush (louder applause and laughter). And they wonder why their ratings continue to fall?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

6 posted on 02/28/2005 3:18:18 PM PST by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

If "The Passion" had been up for more awards I would have watched.


7 posted on 02/28/2005 3:19:51 PM PST by octobersky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I thought Drudge was touting some headline that the Oscar ratings were the "Best Since the Year 2000!"

What happened to that?

I suppose it was all spin from one of his Hollywood buddies.

8 posted on 02/28/2005 3:21:30 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

I'd pay for shipping if the rain would go back to the Northwest for awhile.

There is actually only a slight chance of rain next Sat and Sun, but dry otherwise.


9 posted on 02/28/2005 3:22:03 PM PST by socal_parrot (Tryin' to reason with El Nino season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Yes, the lament about ratings being down because there were no "blockbuster" ($100m+) nominees is laughable.

"The Passion" was THE blockbuster and the judges ignored it, so "The Passion"'s audience ignored the Oscars and awaits its re-release.

Seems fair and balanced to me.


10 posted on 02/28/2005 3:26:25 PM PST by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Here's hoping you all dry out... I lived there during the 1983 El Nino and from what I'm hearing this one's worse.


11 posted on 02/28/2005 3:27:07 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Interesting. On radio, earlier today, ABC News said that the ratings were the highest in 5 years (they said due to Chris Rock).


12 posted on 02/28/2005 3:27:28 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (Fraud is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Ratings were up in the large cities, but down big time in the more rural areas. Which was to be expected, the Oscars this year seemed to have written off red-staters. We only watched the first few minutes, where in the opening movie clips they showed a lady biting a sausage that was strategically positioned over the private parts of a naked guy in the background. Then when Chris Rock started bashing Bush, we turned the channel. I bet a whole lot of people did so, too. Would love to see the incremental viewership numbers.


13 posted on 02/28/2005 3:28:38 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Hmmm ... here's a thought ...

Kid Rock intended to sink the Oscars.

Think about it ... his distaste for the entire affair and he's the one chosen to MC?

Why?

I'll not post "DETERIORATA" again, but it comes to mind.

< / tin foil >

14 posted on 02/28/2005 3:29:03 PM PST by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Wait a minute. Just heard ABC news on the AM dial and they were spouting off on how good the ratings were and they attribute that to Chris Co....er..Rock.

And we all know the MSM would not mislead us (/sarcasm)

15 posted on 02/28/2005 3:29:06 PM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I bet a great deal of that 1983 audience tuned in that year to see if E.T., at that time the most popular film of all time, would win...it lost to Gandhi.

I know I hopelessly aging myself, I remember when STAR WARS first came out. (When it was still shinning and new, not rehashed to death) Everybody was ga-ga over the movie and was sure it would win the Oscar for Best Movie.

Fat chance! Apparently too many of the great unwashed [that's us] liked it. So instead, Best Movie went to Woody Allen's "Annie Hall"!

It was right there I started seeing the Oscars in a whole new light.

16 posted on 02/28/2005 3:29:26 PM PST by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knarf

The host was Chris Rock, not Kid Rock.


17 posted on 02/28/2005 3:29:54 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

I was among those who liked 'Annie Hall' more then Star Wars. It's a great movie!


18 posted on 02/28/2005 3:30:56 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

Thanks, I hope so too. We are moving to Lake Arrowhead in the next few months. The house up there suffered about 5k worth of damage and we can't fix it until the rain stops and things dry out. We got over 90 inches up there.

The good news is the lake is now full. Up from 19 feet down last November.


19 posted on 02/28/2005 3:31:58 PM PST by socal_parrot (Tryin' to reason with El Nino season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The failure of the Oscars wasn't Rock's fault. Sure, he was unfunny and insulted the majority of Americans, but the ratings would have stunk with any other host. America -- or at least the Heartland -- is just sick of Hollywood in general.

Freedom-loving peoples are reshaping the world while terrorists are trying to lop off their heads or blow them up. Meanwhile, Hollywood plays dress up, mock Bush and middle America, then congratulate each other for "courage."

In a world where reality is more amazing than fiction, we just don't find show business all that interesting anymore.

20 posted on 02/28/2005 3:33:11 PM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson