Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HAS ANYONE WONDERED WHY THE MSM HAS ALL-TERRI ALL THE TIME? (VANITY)
Self ^ | MMarch 25, 2005 | Edward Watson

Posted on 03/25/2005 6:23:30 AM PST by Edward Watson

All of us conservatives know the mainstream media is anti-conservative, anti-Republican and anti-Bush. They ridicule and oppose the pro-life movement. They make fun of Catholicism and Evangelicalism (and Mormonism and any Christian conservative denomination).

Why then are they giving the Terri Schiavo situation this extensive coverage? One cannot watch the news on any TV channel or read any newspaper without the Terri Schiavo case as one of the leading stories.

We've learned several things over the past few weeks:

1. President Bush's approval ratings have PLUMMETED since he got involved.

2. Anywhere from 2/3 to 4/5th of those surveyed believe the GOP-led congress and President Bush SHOULDN'T have poked their collective noses into the case.

3. Many of those who want Terri's feeding tube reinserted have vowed to punish the Republicans for not doing enough.

What these mean is there's a direct negative causal effect against President Bush and the Republicans.

This is why the MSM is covering the Terri Schiavo case - they know it's a 'lose-lose' situation for President Bush and the GOP. The longer they play it; the more damage is done to the Republicans.

The leftists and liberal Democrats couldn't be happier. This single case has turned their fortunes around and instead of losing more congressional seats in 2006; they now stand to gain a significant amount - perhaps even retake control over congress.

Why? Because the GOP will lose support from moderates and independents for their 'interference' and will also lose support from those who will want to punish them for not doing enough to keep Terri alive.

So, way to go Republicans! You've now given the Democrats control over the US just because you let your emotions be manipulated without thinking of the consequences.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: msm; schiavo; schiavorepubliccom; shutup; stupidvanity; teeri247; terri; terripalooza; terrischiavo; territv; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: Edward Watson

the msm is all teri al the time because it wants the public to stop realizing the transformation taking place.

Bush's rising orange tide of freedom is going to set more people free than reagan.


41 posted on 03/25/2005 6:51:32 AM PST by spanalot (Bring it On)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

Just another worthless vanity. Good work.


42 posted on 03/25/2005 6:52:47 AM PST by bmwcyle (Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
This issue has divided the Republican base to some degree between the policy conservatives (government should stay out of things) and the social conservatives (government should do whatever it takes to save a life).

The MSM loves this conflict as this type of "crack" in the Republican base might lead to the Dems regaining power. I think that is why they are playing this up so much and doing what ever they can to amplify this "conflict", which is actually not the fracture they hope it is.
43 posted on 03/25/2005 6:53:06 AM PST by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: Edward Watson

I feel like Rip Van Winkle! Have I been asleep this long? Is it really October 2006?

Oh... It's still March 2005?

Get real. This is a big issue now, and it will have some short-term consequences, but I hardly think it's going to have the political impact you describe a year and a half from now.

(I'm not addressing the real, personal and moral issues here. Just the political angle.)


45 posted on 03/25/2005 6:54:57 AM PST by rightcoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
Anywhere from 2/3 to 4/5th of those surveyed believe the GOP-led congress and President Bush SHOULDN'T have poked their collective noses into the case.

Oh my,the msm have a poll that reflects negatively on President Bush and Republicans.I just can`t believe that,its incomprehensible that they would try to put Republicans in an unflattering light.

Who gives a s##t what their polls say.They kept telling us that Clinton had done no wrong either.

46 posted on 03/25/2005 6:56:15 AM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

Considering that Free Republic was "All Terri, all the time" well before the MSM went that way I don't think we can point fingers at MSM bias for not protecting us from outselves. Its another example of the internet/blog culture shaping the MSM news.


47 posted on 03/25/2005 6:57:23 AM PST by Jibaholic (The facts of life are conservative - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

"Should I help save a woman's life or buy a dog named Buddy?"

LOL! Thanks. I needed that. Anything that reminds me that the Klintoons could still be in power always sobers me up to the issues at hand, and reminds me to be grateful, no matter what is going on in our country on any given day. :)


48 posted on 03/25/2005 6:58:09 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

"Catholicism and Evangelicalism (and Mormonism and any Christian conservative denomination"

A good many of the Evangelicals I've known (I used to go to an Evangelical church) would say that Catholics and Mormons aren't really Christians. Can you feel the love?


49 posted on 03/25/2005 6:58:14 AM PST by RepublicMan4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

The fact that you cite bogus statistics from MSM push-polling tells me all I need to know about your agenda.


50 posted on 03/25/2005 7:00:46 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
JusticeUSA MSM Loves The Justice Department.

51 posted on 03/25/2005 7:00:49 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Ive seen plenty of coverage on the school shooting.


52 posted on 03/25/2005 7:01:03 AM PST by PatriotGirl827 (Member of the Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
I, personally am tired of seeing the three second balloon clip out of FOUR hours of videotape where Teri is unresponsive! This is very misleading! A disclaimer should be included!
53 posted on 03/25/2005 7:02:22 AM PST by F105-D ThunderChief (That "THUD" you heard was the Collapse of the DemocRats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Only because the question was worded as to appear to the uninvolved that Schiavo was on life support. Note that the poll question did not ask whether it was ok to deny all nutrition ORALLY.

Also - re the right to die issue - the poll question was worded in such a way as to imply her wishes were quite clear when it is anything but.

Biased polls produce worthless results.


54 posted on 03/25/2005 7:04:14 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
Because the GOP will lose support from moderates and independents for their 'interference'

If Terri Schiavo dies, I think you will see a lot of remorse among these "moderates and independents", and that backlash will go against the Deathocrats and the tyrannical judiciary. IMHO.

55 posted on 03/25/2005 7:06:22 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Dan Rather is itching to get on, he has whole stack of genuine memos to prove that Terri wanted what scumbag husband says.
Terri wil shake up "judicial" establishment.


56 posted on 03/25/2005 7:08:40 AM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeePeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

You're reading this all wrong. Joe Indifferent is seeing a very high-profile it-could-happen-to-me example of how the Democrats are the Party of Death. Even plenty of liberals can see the plain truth of this case and are horrified by the courts sentencing an innocent woman to death, and worse, confirming and reconfirming it.

This will have a far greater destructive impact on the Democrats, who are struggling to hold even their shrinking coalition together, than the GOP. The dissenters in the GOP are largely federalists, and none of them are going to be fooled into thinking the Democrats' opportunistic promotion of federalism will last any longer than they believe it gives them advantage. But the emotion-driven among the left won't soon forget the power of the Democrats applied to gleeful murder.


57 posted on 03/25/2005 7:10:38 AM PST by thoughtomator (Terri Schiavo, murdered by court order. Who's next? Maybe you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
What good is a government that starves a disabled woman to death? What good is a party that lets it?

Highly unfair comment. Ms. Schiavo would have been dead years ago without the support of Republicans like Jeb Bush. The Republicans TRIED. The democrats stood by and demanded she die.

For this the Republicans are punished. And many on this site state they will not vote for Republicans again.

What is your solution? You contend the Republicans LET this happen. What did your new party, the democrats do to help?
58 posted on 03/25/2005 7:10:52 AM PST by Republican Red (DU: ''Reality sucks. That's the problem. We want another reality.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
It takes 24/7 spin to shape this story to help the DNC!

I agree. Democrats, like Geraldine Ferraro are popping up all over the place to "explain things" to the public. They set up smokescreens to the real issues by spouting arguments that are totally unrelated to the major issues which are

  1. Does Terri have constitutional rights?
  2. If Terri has constitutional rights, are Terri's constitutional rights being protected?
  3. Was Terri properly diagnosed?
  4. Are we sureTerri said she wants to die?

Geraldine "educated" us today, saying that she is Catholic, as are the Schindlers, and Catholics believe in an afterlife. Geraldine also said if she were Terri she'd hate to have her picture broadcast all over the place. If Geraldine were PVS (as she says Terri is) she would not care a whit whether her picture were broadcast.

What do either of Geraldine's comments have to do with the real issues.?

Moran is on FoxNews now, saying we should be dealing with other issues like educating the thousands of other handicapped individuals. (Another non sequiter).

59 posted on 03/25/2005 7:11:38 AM PST by syriacus (Cranford says "Terri has no constitutional rights." Then why has she got a "right" to be starved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
"For this the Republicans are punished. And many on this site state they will not vote for Republicans again"

I doubt many people will be swayed either way by this case 20 months from now (November 2006 elections).

60 posted on 03/25/2005 7:12:56 AM PST by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson