Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: expatpat
"You have to know that there was no solid evidence that the patient wanted to be starved of all food and water, orally or otherwise."

No, I don't think that Terri specifically requested starvation. Is that your new standard?

Give me a break with your stupid strawmen.

The judge had "clear and convincing" evidence (a Florida requirement) that Terri would not want to live the way she was. That's solid enough for me.

Now, what are you suggesting that the judge do at this point? Seriously. What should he have done? Lethal injection? What?

306 posted on 04/20/2005 12:22:28 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
The judge had "clear and convincing" evidence (a Florida requirement) that Terri would not want to live the way she was. That's solid enough for me.

With that level of credulity and naiveity, you should avoid anyone with Florida swampland to sell.

312 posted on 04/20/2005 12:27:56 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen

That's easy - Greer should have allowed oral hydration. If Terry couldn't drink or tolerate enough to keep alive, at least the people around her wouldn't have been tortured. If she could - and would - then we'd truly know.

Forbidding oral hydration for comfort care was murder - a deliberate action intended to cause death by that direct action.


399 posted on 04/20/2005 7:58:37 PM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson