Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dawgreg

yeah...

As one part of my family comes from Michigan and the other part comes from Tennessee, I just see it as the American Civil War personally.

But I can clearly see how the South would see it was an aggressive war, but they DID fire first, and, ironically enough, last for that matter in Texas :)


56 posted on 07/04/2005 5:41:26 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Sleep in peace, comrades dear...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: MikeinIraq

Mike, had you heard that before the war, the Radical Republicans were going to kick the South out of the union as soon as Lincoln was elected? If this is true and I have no reason to doubt, (it's in the Congressional record), the South's days were numbered anyway. I HATE that they acted too soon and gave Lincoln what he wanted.


60 posted on 07/04/2005 5:46:28 AM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq

Last soldier died in Texas........what was it? About 1 or 2 months AFTER Appromattox Courthouse?


65 posted on 07/04/2005 5:50:16 AM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq
But I can clearly see how the South would see it was an aggressive war, but they DID fire first, and, ironically enough, last for that matter in Texas :)

IMO, war between North and South was inevitable, even had the secession been allowed. The South needed/wanted to expand slavery westward and northward, and the North wanted to prevent its spread. This was the underlying pressure for the Sectional Crises, not to mention the secessions themselves.

The antagonism would probably only have escalated had the Confederacy succeeded in becoming its own country, though the war itself would probably have started in the West. The real joker in the deck would have been Britain: would they have been willing to openly support an unambiguously independent South? Probably so, and the North couldn't allow that, for a number of reasons.

The North had a lot more at stake than just "preserving the Union."

88 posted on 07/04/2005 8:14:33 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson