Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
What? Dylan's singing or the quality of sound? (you can't have both) Probably sound like those bootleg Beatles recordings from Germany in 1962...

The quality of the sound is what I'm talking about. His singing will sound the same, and that's what will make it good. :)

14 posted on 07/05/2005 10:39:24 AM PDT by NRA2BFree (Something ate my tag line.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: NRA2BFree

You mean all the modern techno-digital-mixer-synthesized-bass-boosted-companded-expanded-echo-chambered-what-ch-ma-call-its can't make Dylan sound any better than he did in 1962?.............


16 posted on 07/05/2005 10:45:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (The Army makes the world safe for democracy. The Marines make the world safe for the Army.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: NRA2BFree
The quality of the sound is what I'm talking about. His singing will sound the same, and that's what will make it good

As a voice teacher I can say with certainty that his sound is not "good". It may be distinctive, but it is bad and ugly, poorly produced, problematic. If you like bad and ugly, well, fine, but for a real voice try Thomas Hampson, Bryn Terfel, or Andrea Bocelli (to name but a few of the biggies).

46 posted on 07/05/2005 2:24:54 PM PDT by Conservatrix ("He who stands for nothing will fall for anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson