Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pot icon Tommy Chong makes movie of his imprisonment
reuters.com ^ | 9 10 05 | Cameron French

Posted on 09/12/2005 4:36:47 PM PDT by freepatriot32

TORONTO (Reuters) - Comedian Tommy Chong has spent almost three decades wringing laughs from cigar-sized joints and smoke-filled vans but now a nine-month jail term has turned him serious and revitalized his flagging career.

Promoting his documentary "a/k/a Tommy Chong" at the Toronto International Film Festival, he hopes the film will expose what he says is the U.S. government's heavy-handed dealing with marijuana offenders in the post-September 11 era.

"The United States is under martial law, it's under dictatorship," the 67-year-old father of four said in an interview.

The film chronicles the Canadian-born comedian's 2003 arrest and imprisonment for selling drug paraphernalia online to an undercover U.S. drug enforcement agent.

The bust was part of a sting operation known as "Operation Pipe Dreams," which the film likens to a witch hunt by former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft following claims that drug trafficking financed terrorist activities.

The film's producers say the federal government spent $12 million pursuing Chong and compare that to the $25 million bounty for the capture of Osama bin Laden.

Chong has been an outspoken marijuana advocate since his days in the Cheech and Chong comedy team, which rode pot culture to fame in the 1970s with films like "Up in Smoke" and "Still Smokin."

The documentary suggests the government's motive was not to rid the Internet of a mail-order pipe-and-bong business but to send a message about Chong's three decades of movies and stand-up routines celebrating marijuana use.

"DEA AFRAID"

"The DEA was afraid that 'Up in Smoke' (the 1978 movie that made Cheech and Chong a household name) was going to be around forever and ever subverting young kids," Chong said. "Now, we've got this documentary that's going to be around forever."

Faced with the prospect of seeing his wife and son -- who was running the pipe business -- being prosecuted, Chong said he made a deal to serve nine months in a minimum-security prison

"It was easier for me to go to jail and do the time than it would be to fight," he said.

Since his release in 2004, Chong has worked the ordeal into his comedy routines and has been enjoying a larger stage than in his recent past.

"Jay Leno is a good example," he said. "He had me on the 'Tonight Show' before but just for little peripheral things, never on the couch, and when this happened, now I've been on the couch twice now."

"It's like the weed culture. You just wait, it'll change. Everything changes. Bush won't be in power forever, Ashcroft is already gone. There's going to be another cycle and it's going to go the other way."


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: baliffwhackhispeepee; baliffwhackhispp; chatwardbound; chittychittychatchat; davesnothere; dope; dopeheads; dopers; dopesmokingchat; druggielosers; dudedontharshmybuzz; dudeiwannagethigh; freaks; govwatch; his; hollywoodpinglist; iamsooooooooowasted; icon; imprisonment; iwannasmokepotmommy; johnsvan; liberaldopeheads; liberalitarians; makes; movedtochat; movie; of; passthebongman; pot; potheads; stoners; tommychong; turnonthelavalamp; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-376 next last
To: Clemenza

You may smoke outside or in your home. You may not pollute the public air indoors where people can't avoid it.

Yes, the libertarian party backed NAMBLA faggots as well with the ACLU before... GREAT POINT! Thanks.


61 posted on 09/12/2005 5:39:28 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

Yes, we should keep illegal drugs illegal, we agree! :-)


62 posted on 09/12/2005 5:40:08 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
'Are you calling individual liberty "garbage"?'

No. You are not at liberty to break the law.

63 posted on 09/12/2005 5:40:41 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
equate the joint to a fifth of Jack Daniels.

They are quite comparable ... except that only the JD can kill you.

64 posted on 09/12/2005 5:41:31 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
You don't see people unzipping and urinating at your public dinner table

If the restaurant wanted to allow that, and gave prospective patrons advance warning, why would it be any of your business to prevent it? If you don't like it, simply don't go there ... instead of crying to Nanny Government like a baby.

65 posted on 09/12/2005 5:43:39 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
No. You are not at liberty to break the law.

What profound drivel.

66 posted on 09/12/2005 5:44:06 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"except that only the JD can kill you."

LOL!

Wait... Jack Daniels can kill you because it can cause you to wrap your car around a tree, but a joint can't do that!?

Smoking cigarettes can kill you via lung cancer, but smoking joints can't!?

Talk about denial!

67 posted on 09/12/2005 5:45:35 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Libertarians Drug Warriors can't handle the drug issue straight on, so they try to drag in pretend that cigs, alcohol aren't also drugs.
68 posted on 09/12/2005 5:46:28 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Law -- profound drivel.

Gotcha.


69 posted on 09/12/2005 5:46:39 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
"Not at liberty to break the law" -

Drivel.

70 posted on 09/12/2005 5:48:16 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Why is it government's business to force "worthless druggies" to "straighten out"?

Because the druggies were breaking the law

That doesn't answer the question, which is why the law prohibits drug use (except for the drug use it allows, like drinking).

71 posted on 09/12/2005 5:49:07 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
Because when some are too uncouth to live in a society with some level of dignity and common sense, the people or their representatives set minimum standards is why
72 posted on 09/12/2005 5:49:07 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
You may not pollute the public air indoors where people can't avoid it.

People can't avoid going to restaurants? Sounds like an addiction ... we'd better ban it.

73 posted on 09/12/2005 5:51:01 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Ah, okay. Have fun with that lawlessness.

I'm the guy with the shotgun. See ya' there.


74 posted on 09/12/2005 5:51:44 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
alcohol is bad

So by your logic we should ban it, right?

Yes, we should keep illegal drugs illegal

What a pathetic evasion. Aren't you ashamed to publicly engage in such cowardly behavior?

75 posted on 09/12/2005 5:52:53 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

The minimum standards of what is expected in behavior is raising as civilizations become more advanced.

Makes sense therefore that libertarians would be set back by events such as these.


76 posted on 09/12/2005 5:52:57 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

You say alcohol is bad?
In excess, you are completely right.


77 posted on 09/12/2005 5:54:23 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
You are not at liberty to break the law.

So if we banned plaid shirts, that would be OK, since wearing them would then be against the law and thus not a liberty?

78 posted on 09/12/2005 5:54:30 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
Ah, okay. Have fun with that lawlessness.

I'm the guy with the shotgun. See ya' there.

Where is "there"? Will you be the one telling people "You can't have bullets in an unloaded gun?"

79 posted on 09/12/2005 5:55:04 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
Jack Daniels can kill you because it can cause you to wrap your car around a tree

Jack Daniels can kill you because it can cause you to go into an irreversible coma. The joint can't.

80 posted on 09/12/2005 5:55:39 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson