Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NordP

The Justice said he had NO CHOICE because another court case ruled against the Pledge.
The Supremes overturned the case based on the plaintiff not having custody over the children he was ligating over.

This time there were three plaintiffs who were guardians of their children who made the complaint.

Yep, this needs to be b.tch slapped to hell where it came from.


51 posted on 09/14/2005 8:43:08 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy
Yep, and that Judge needs to get one of these...


53 posted on 09/14/2005 8:47:28 PM PDT by NordP (Must See TV - Mark Levin's Supreme Court Nomination Hearings ----- I WISH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson