Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Republicanprofessor

Do you think the abstract Christian art was felt to be more in keeping with the biblical ban on graven images?

BTW, I'm not too convinced by the last 2 :-)


5 posted on 09/25/2005 12:13:47 PM PDT by Sam Cree (absolute reality - Miami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Cree
There was a huge iconoclastic controversy in the 7th or 8th centuries. I don't follow it well (I guess because my field is those very icons and graven images that were banned), but I think even images such as those of Justinian and Theodora would have been banned then too. So Early Christian art was not just flat because of the graven image ban (although sculpture was definitely a secondary art, perhaps in part because of the graven image idea).

I don't see the Frank Stella, the last image, as very spiritual; but he was explicitly inspired by those early Medieval pieces like the ones I posted, so that's why I included him. I do see, and feel, Kandinsky as very spiritual. His work just soars and raises my spirits (mood). But we dealt with him before.

6 posted on 09/25/2005 12:24:10 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson